What do ResearchBuzz, The Handheld Librarian, LibraryPlanet.com, The Rabid Librarian’s Ravings in the Wind and wiredfu have in common?
But Still They Blog: The Liblog Landscape 2007-2009
You’ll find this and more in But Still They Blog: The Liblog Landscape 2007-2009, now available at the special introductory price of $29.50 paperback, $20 PDF.
This 319-page trade paperback provides a sweeping look at liblogs (blogs created by library people but, generally, not blogs that are official library publications), with trends, facts, figures, graphs, and profiles for each of 521 liblogs. It continues the most comprehensive detailed look at liblogs (or any category of blogs) that I know of, showing measurable characteristics and how they’re changing over the years.
Chapter 1: But Still They Blog
The first chapter considers what might be happening with liblogs, changes in methodology and inclusion since The Liblog Landscape 2007-2008 (which is still available), changes in metrics this time around, and a few general comments on the 521 liblogs included this time around:
- Their age
- Blogging platform used
- Currency as of September 30, 2009–that is, the most recent post as of that date.
Hint: You’ll find the answer starting on page 13.
Profiles: The Pioneers
In this book, individual blog profiles generally appear in the chapter where the blog is first mentioned. For Chapter 1, I profile the blogs that have been around for more than five years (that is, blogs beginning in 2003 or before), plus the blog you’re reading now–used as an example of what’s in the profiles. (And this year, most–but not all–liblog profiles include brief subjective comments.)
Profiles for these blogs appear in Chapter 1:
- Walt at Random
- ResearchBuzz
- librarian.net
- The Handheld Librarian
- LibraryPlanet.com
- ResourceShelf
- Emerging
- Scholarly Electronic Publishing Weblog
- The Rabid Librarian’s Ravings in the Wind
- wiredfu
- rawbrick.net
- The Shifted Librarian
- BookBitchBlog
- Catalogablog
- Caveat Lector
- Wigblog – Things Internet and Otherwise by Richard Wiggins
- MaisonBisson.com
- Open Access News
- eclectic librarian
- Lady Crumpet’s Armoire
- beSpacific
- etc.
- frontier librarian
- Saving the world daily through information
- the pod bay door
- Confessions of a Science Librarian
- mamamusings
- DrWeb’s Domain
- Union Librarian
- At Home He’s a Tourist
- Book Kitten
- Library Link of the Day
- Library Stuff
- Sites and Soundbytes
- Citegeist
- The Misadventures of Super_Librarian
- Pattern Recognition
- Peter Scott’s Library Blog
- Phil Bradley’s weblog
- The Laughing Librarian
- Open Stacks
- SciTech Library Question
- TangognaT
- Creative Librarian
- The Invisible Library
- j’s scratchpad
- Libraryman
- UK Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Blog
- Attempting Elegance
- explodedlibrary.info
- Library Monk
- Ref Grunt
- DIY Librarian
- The Galecia Group
- Librarian
- The Ten Thousand Year Blog
- The Days & Nights of the Lipstick Librarian!
- Free Range Librarian
- The Information Literacy Land of Confusion
- Tiny Little Librarian
- Travelin’ Librarian
- Kids Lit
- Librarian’s Rant
- SemiConscious Dot Org
- Young Librarian
- blogwithoutalibrary.net
- David Lee King
- Hip Librarians Book Blog
- LibrariAnne
- Books, Bargains, & Beer
- The Hot Librarian
- The In Season Christian Librarian
- Knowbodies
- Library Chronicles
- Lorcan Dempsey’s weblog
- Overdue Ideas
- The Well Dressed Librarian
- Beyond the Job
- Books to curl up with: a librarian’s musings
- Borderland Tales
- Confessions of a Mad Librarian
- The Illustrated Librarian
- Infotoday Blog
- LibrarianActivist.org
- Library Stories: Libraries & Librarians in the News
- User Education Resources for Librarians
- Professional-Lurker: Comments by an academic in cyberspace
Uh–dare I ask if I got a positive review?
LInda
Linda: The subjective comments aren’t generally “reviews,” just quick notes. What I said in your case was, “These days, the few posts here are largely professional–and continue to be interesting.” (Your posting frequency was, shall we say, down just a bit in March-May 2009…) So, yes, I’d call it positive.