Archive for the '$4' Category

Iowa public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 31st, 2012

Another post commenting on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13)–now available as a $9.99 Kindle ebook or $21.95 paperback with ISBN 978-1481279161 on Amazon, along with the usual Lulu options.

Iowa has a lot of public libraries for its three million people, 511 in the tables and another 30 omitted. They’re reasonably well distributed for expenditures—light at the top and very bottom, heavy in the middle. Whether adjusted or not, median benefit ratios for all expense categories are well above 4 (above 5 without adjustment). Circulation is just a bit on the low side, and expenses correlate very well with circulation. Patron visits tend slightly on the high side (with, again, full step-by-step expense correlation). Program attendance is slightly on the high side, with 53% having at least 0.4 per capita attendance (compared to 42% overall) and PC use per capita is significantly on the high side, with 31% having at least 2.25 uses per capita and 74% having one or more (compared to 19% and 57% overall).

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count % Outliers
<700 94 18.4% 24
700-1,149 77 15.1% 4
1,150-1,649 55 10.8% 2
1,650-2,249 69 13.5%
2,250-2,999 39 7.6%
3,000-3,999 43 8.4%
4,000-5,299 24 4.7%
5,300-6,799 19 3.7%
6,800-8,699 20 3.9%
8,700-11,099 17 3.3%
11,100-14,099 16 3.1%
14,100-18,499 7 1.4%
18,500-24,999 8 1.6%
25,000-34,499 8 1.6%
34,500-53,999 5 1.0%
54,000-104,999 8 1.6%
105,000-4.1 mill. 2 0.4%

Circulation per capita and spending per capita

Unusually, there’s only moderate correlation (0.45) between circulation per capita and spending per capita.

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category

Georgia public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 27th, 2012

Another post commenting on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13)–now available as a $9.99 Kindle ebook or $21.95 paperback with ISBN 978-1481279161 on Amazon, along with the usual Lulu options.

The sixty-one libraries in the tables (none omitted) have relatively low expenditures: none higher than $35.99 and nearly three-quarters in the bottom three brackets (compared to 28% overall). As with spending, so with use: No library has more than 9 circs per capita, and 89% have less than six (compared to 36% overall)—but only two libraries (3%) have less than two circ per capita. For what it’s worth, the correlation between spending and circulation is consistent. Patron visits per capita are also on the low side, with no library reaching 9 (20% do overall) and 87% below 4 (compared to 35% overall). Only 16% of the libraries have at least 0.3 program attendance per capita (compared to 54% overall) and none exceeds 0.69 (compared to 21% overall).

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count %
14,100-18,499 3 4.92
18,500-24,999 3 4.9%
25,000-34,499 5 8.2%
34,500-53,999 8 13.1%
54,000-104,999 15 24.6%
105,000-4.1 mill. 27 44.3%

Circulation per capita and spending per capita

Unusually, for Georgia libraries circulation per capita only correlates moderately well (0.44) with spending per capita.

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category

Note that, while I’ve used the standard template for the second chart, in fact the four highest spending categories ($36 and up) are meaningless for the chart, since no Georgia libraries spend that much.

Florida public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 24th, 2012

Another post commenting on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13)–now available as a $9.99 Kindle ebook or $21.95 paperback, with ISBN 978-1481279161, on Amazon, along with the usual Lulu options.

Like California (but more so), Florida has relatively few libraries and systems for its population: 80 (all in the tables, none omitted). Funding tends toward the low side, with only 5% in the top two brackets and 21% in the top four, compared to 30% in the bottom two brackets and 59% in the bottom four. Similarly, circulation per capita tends toward the low side, with only 11% having at least 10 circ per capita (38% overall)—and patron visits are similar, with 20% having six or more (42% overall). I could say that it’s noteworthy that the median circulation for libraries in the highest spending bracket is nearly twice that of the second highest—but with only two libraries in each of those two brackets, that’s not especially meaningful (although those are the only brackets where even the 75%ile is at least 10 circ per capita). Program attendance is quite low, with 65% having less than 0.3 attendance per capita (compared to 46% overall). The same goes for PC use: 16% with at least 1.7 uses per capita, compared to 30% overall.

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count %
1,650-2,249

1

1.3%

3,000-3,999

1

1.3%

4,000-5,299

1

1.3%

5,300-6,799

1

1.3%

6,800-8,699

1

1.3%

8,700-11,099

3

3.8%

11,100-14,099

2

2.5%

14,100-18,499

4

5.0%

18,500-24,999

4

5.0%

25,000-34,499

2

2.5%

34,500-53,999

8

10.0%

54,000-104,999

16

20.0%

105,000-4.1 mill.

36

45.0%

Circulation per capita and spending per capita

Circulation per capita correlates very strongly (0.75) with spending per capita

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category

 

The Last Day(s)

Posted in $4, Cites & Insights on December 21st, 2012

No, not that grotesque misreading of Mayan calendar systems, that insult to a great civilization and to thinking people everywhere.

But it is the last day to get Graphing Public Library Benefits for a ridiculously low $1.99 (PDF, no DRM, feel free to pass it along to others). (For some reason, the link at the bottom of the page–and in earlier posts–may not have worked right. It’s fixed now: I’ve tried it.)

It is also one of the last days to take part in a brief survey on format and content preferences for Cites & Insights (ending 12/24/12), to help me decide how (and whether) to continue C&I in 2013. [If you feel strongly about it, a donation from the C&I home page wouldn't hurt: Reaching at least three digits for total support in 2012 would be nice.]

Oh, and for some of you, it’s very much the last days for holiday shopping. Good luck.

Delaware public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 19th, 2012

Another post commenting on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13)–now available as a $9.99 Kindle ebook or $21.95 paperback, with ISBN 978-1481279161, on Amazon, along with the usual Lulu options.

Only 21 libraries (none omitted)—but eight of the ten expenditure categories are represented (the top and bottom are missing). A few things stand out even with the small group of libraries—e.g., the best-funded library (the only one with at least $53 spending per capita, and just barely above that mark) has nearly twice the circulation of the median for any other expenditure category and two-thirds more than the next-best 75%ile. That library isn’t highest for any of the other metrics.

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count %
5,300-6,799

5

23.8%

6,800-8,699

1

4.8%

11,100-14,099

5

23.8%

14,100-18,499

2

9.5%

18,500-24,999

2

9.5%

25,000-34,499

1

4.8%

34,500-53,999

2

9.5%

54,000-104,999

2

9.5%

105,000-4.1 mill.

1

4.8%

Circulation per capita and spending per capita

Circulation per capita correlates strongly (0.70) with spending per capita.

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

While the graph above is fairly clear and meaningful, the graph below is possibly the most useless graph I’ve prepared to date, although that’s a tough competition. Even rounding circulation to the nearest 5, it has little to show; if I didn’t do that, the graph would have two rows (1 and 2). As you may note, there are no libraries in the $5 and $73 categories.

Circulation per capita (rounded to five) occurrence by spending category

Give Us a Dollar… Kindle edition now available

Posted in $4 on December 18th, 2012

Kindle users out there can now buy Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13for $9.99–and if you’re eligible for the Kindle Library, you can borrow it for free.

So there are now five options to acquire Give Us a Dollar..., to help your public library tell its value story or to help you understand the diversity of America’s public libraries:

Why do the Amazon and Lulu versions have different cover designs? Because I used “canned” cover designs in both cases instead of designing my own photo-based covers, and CreateSpace (Amazon’s PoD service) has very different covers from those at Lulu.

Neither the Kindle edition nor the PDF have DRM, or at least they’re not supposed to.

And don’t forget…

Graphing Public Library Benefits, a supplement to Give Us a Dollar... that’s just chock-full of graphs (scatterplots and multicolor line graphs) to illustrate the numbers in Chapters 2-19 of Give Us a Dollar. It’s only available as a PDF (no DRM). Normally $11.99 (and a bargain at that price), it’s available at an absurd $1.99 through December 21, 2012.

Give Us a Dollar… now on Amazon, coming on Kindle

Posted in $4 on December 17th, 2012

buck4fy10amcvrIf your library has an Amazon account but has difficulty ordering from Lulu, or if you just prefer Amazon for various reasons–free shipping, whatever–you’ll be pleased to hear that there’s now a CreateSpace edition of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13) at Amazon.

Same price: $21.95 paperback.

As you can see from the image here, the cover is entirely different (other than the author and title, and even there the typography’s wildly different): This is one of CreateSpace’s stock covers, very different from Lulu’s stock covers.

There’s even an ISBN for this edition: 978-1481279161 (or for traditionalists, 1481279165).

The interior is absolutely identical: It’s the same PDF file.

But wait! There’s more!

Coming soon (probably Tuesday, 12/18)

Want to have the book for your Kindle?

You can–as soon as Amazon’s Kindle Direct Program makes it public. That’s supposed to be in the next eight hours in the U.S., within three days overseas.

At that point, a search for “Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give” should bring up both editions.

The Kindle edition is $9.99 (the KDP program offers very strong incentives not to charge more than $9.99).

It looks pretty good. If you have a 7″ Kindle, you’ll probably need to go landscape for some tables, but for the DX or Fire HD 8.9, it should work fine as is. Yes, there’s a live table of contents. Some day soon, I’ll do another mini-tutorial for the Micropublishing book, describing what’s now a pretty straightforward process to turn a fully-formatted Word book into something Kindle’s happy with.

Connecticut public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 17th, 2012

The seventh of 49 notes on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13), this time on the public libraries of Connecticut.

Connecticut has 178 libraries in the tables and 17 omitted libraries. Funding is generally good, with roughly 16% in each of the top four brackets ($36 and up) and less than 8% in the bottom three combined (under $21). Adjusted for Connecticut’s cost of living, the median benefit ratio for every bracket exceeds four.

Circulation is “bulgy,” with very few libraries in the highest and lowest activity brackets and quite a few in the middle brackets, but still on the high side, with 62% circulating at least eight items per capita (compared to 50% overall). There’s consistent correlation between expenditures and circulation. Visits per capita are also slightly bulgy (few libraries at either extreme). Program attendance is better than average: nearly half the libraries (46%) have at least 0.5 attendance per capita, compared to exactly one-third overall. (Expenditures correlate nicely with program success here as well.) On the other hand, PC use is on the low side: Only 8% show at least 2.25 uses per capita (compared to 19% overall) and only 46% have at least one use per capita (compared to 57% overall). Even for the best-funded libraries, the median is no more than 1.6 uses per capita.

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count % Outliers
700-1,149

2

1.1%

1,150-1,649

4

2.2%

1,650-2,249

6

3.4%

1

2,250-2,999

6

3.4%

3,000-3,999

9

5.1%

4,000-5,299

11

6.2%

5,300-6,799

13

7.3%

6,800-8,699

9

5.1%

5

8,700-11,099

17

9.6%

11,100-14,099

15

8.4%

14,100-18,499

19

10.7%

1

18,500-24,999

18

10.1%

5

25,000-34,499

17

9.6%

2

34,500-53,999

13

7.3%

1

54,000-104,999

14

7.9%

2

105,000-4.1 mill.

5

2.8%

Circulation per capita and spending per capita

Circulation per capita correlates very strongly (0.76) with spending per capita

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category

Colorado public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 14th, 2012

The sixth of 49 notes on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13), this time on the public libraries of California  Colorado.

Colorado’s 112 profiled libraries (with two others omitted) tend to be reasonably well funded, with 59 (53%) evenly distributed among the top three expenditure brackets (compared to 30% overall). Circulation is also on the high side, with slightly over half the libraries circulating at least 10 items per capita (compared to 38% overall) and only 12% of the libraries circulating fewer than 4 (compared to 21% overall). Visits per capita are distinctly on the high side, with 42% at nine or more visits per capita and 79% at five or more (compared to 20% and 54% respectively). Actually, all of the reported metrics are on the high side: 70% of the libraries had at least 0.3 program attendance per capita (54% overall) and 56% of the libraries had at least 1.7 PC uses per capita (30% overall).

Correlation between spending and circulation is good for the upper two-thirds of spending brackets, but the half-dozen libraries spending $21 to $25.99 have higher circulation than you’d expect (and also have the highest Benefit Ratio of any group). The same correlation and exception appear for program attendance.

Libraries by Legal Service Area

LSA Count % Outliers
<700 5 4.5%
700-1,149 8 7.1%
1,150-1,649 7 6.3%
1,650-2,249 7 6.3%
2,250-2,999 5 4.5%
3,000-3,999 10 8.9%
4,000-5,299 5 4.5%
5,300-6,799 9 8.0% 1
6,800-8,699 7 6.3%
8,700-11,099 5 4.5%
11,100-14,099 7 6.3%
14,100-18,499 8 7.1%
18,500-24,999 4 3.6%
25,000-34,499 3 2.7% 1
34,500-53,999 5 4.5%
54,000-104,999 5 4.5%
105,000-4.1 mill. 12 10.7%

Circulation Per Capita and Spending Per Capita

There’s a strong correlation (0.64) between circulation per capita and spending per capita.

Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category

California public libraries

Posted in $4 on December 12th, 2012

The fifth of 49 notes on Chapter 20 of Give Us a Dollar and We’ll Give You Back Four (2012-13), this time on the public libraries of California.

California has relatively few libraries for its population—176 libraries and systems in the tables (with five omitted, including one very large system). Unusual expenditure levels are at the top (17.6% spending $73 to $399.99, compared to 9.8% overall) and lower middle (15.3% in the $21 to $25.99 bracket, compared to 10.9% overall). Adjusted for California’s high cost of living, the median adjusted benefit ratio is always at least 4.00. Circulation is on the low side, with half the libraries circulating fewer than 6 items per capita (36% overall). Patron visits are also slightly on the low side, with 46% of libraries having at least 5 visits (54% overall). Program attendance is considerably worse: 48% have less than 0.2 attendance per capita, compared to 30% overall. Similarly, 55% have less than one PC use per capita, compared to 43% overall.

On the budget side, circulation per capita correlates well with spending (except for a small step down at $26 to $30.99) and visits per capita correlate fairly well (except for a small step down at $17 to $20.99).

Libraries by legal service area

LSA Count % Outliers
<700 0.00% 1
1,150-1,649 1 0.6%
1,650-2,249 2 1.1%
4,000-5,299 1 0.6%
5,300-6,799 1 0.6%
6,800-8,699 1 0.6%
8,700-11,099 2 1.1%
11,100-14,099 7 4.0% 2
14,100-18,499 8 4.6%
18,500-24,999 5 2.8%
25,000-34,499 12 6.8%
34,500-53,999 18 10.2% 1
54,000-104,999 45 25.6%
105,000-4.1 mill. 73 41.5% 1

Tables

I used California as an example of the tables that could have been included in Graphing Public Library Benefits—but would have added 250 pages or so to an already-long ebook. Since that content is already handy, here it is: More than I’m providing for other states. This section covers 176 libraries and is copied unmodified from Chapter 20 of GPLB.

Figure 20.1 Spending per capita (rounded) occurrence

Circulation Per Capita

Circulation per capita correlates very strongly (0.75) with spending per capita. Figure 20.2 omits one library that circulates 54.33 items per capita and spends $195 per capita.

Figure 20.2 Circulation per capita plotted against spending per capita

Figure 20.3 Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category, part 1

Figure 20.4 Circulation per capita (rounded) occurrence by spending category, part 2

Patron Visits Per Capita

Patron visits per capita correlate extremely strongly (0.87) with spending per capita.

Figure 20.5 Patron visits per capita plotted against spending per capita

Figure 20.6 Patron visits per capita (rounded, horizontal) occurrence by spending category, part 1

Figure 20.7 Patron visits per capita (rounded, horizontal) occurrence by spending category, part 2

Program Attendance Per Capita

Program attendance per capita correlates moderately (0.41) with spending per capita. Figure 20.8 omits one library with 6.32 program attendance per capita and $51 spending per capita.

Figure 20.8 Program attendance per capita plotted against spending per capita

Figure 20.9 Program attendance (to nearest 10th) occurrence by spending category, part 1

Figure 20.10 Program attendance (to nearest 10th) occurrence by spending category, part 2

Personal Computer Use Per Capita

Personal computer use per capita correlates strongly (0.65) with spending per capita.

Figure 20.11 Personal computer use per capita plotted against spending per capita

Figure 20.12 PC use per capita (rounded to 10ths) occurrence by spending category, part 1

Figure 20.13 PC use per capita (rounded to 10ths) occurrence by spending category, part 2

 


This blog is protected by dr Dave\\\\\\\'s Spam Karma 2: 91363 Spams eaten and counting...