<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Reading (or not)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2011/01/2010-reading-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2011/01/2010-reading-or-not/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2011/01/2010-reading-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-53907</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 14:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2862#comment-53907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dang, I can&#039;t believe I forgot about good ole Analog, which somewhat ironically we used to get at the library I used to work at. You&#039;d think I&#039;d remember. These days I get a lot of scifi short fiction on anthologies; I tend to get Hartwell and Cramer Year&#039;s Best every year to keep up, which the better half usually reads first since she really loves short fiction sf (not to mention reads a lot faster than I do). 

Best, and keep on blogging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, I can&#8217;t believe I forgot about good ole Analog, which somewhat ironically we used to get at the library I used to work at. You&#8217;d think I&#8217;d remember. These days I get a lot of scifi short fiction on anthologies; I tend to get Hartwell and Cramer Year&#8217;s Best every year to keep up, which the better half usually reads first since she really loves short fiction sf (not to mention reads a lot faster than I do). </p>
<p>Best, and keep on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2011/01/2010-reading-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-53838</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2862#comment-53838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Angel: Unfortunately, I have no record... Mysteries include some lightweight but fun page-turners (the &quot;Burglar Who...&quot; series by Lawrence Block); SF includes, well, some fantasy (several of Pratchett&#039;s Discworld books, but I&#039;m caught up other than the 8 trade paperbacks I own and haven&#039;t yet read, #s 21-28 in the series).

18 subscriptions is fewer than I have had at times, particularly in terms of amount of text and number of issues. That includes five travel-related, three stereo &amp; home theater-related, two business-related (paid for with miles) and one PC-related (down from five at one point).

The other SF magazine? I&#039;m shocked: The oldest of them all: Analog. (I think it still has the highest circulation also, although Asimov&#039;s--same publisher--might be higher. Unfortunately, &quot;highest&quot; these days is still pathetic, under 20,000, I think.)

How many of the books I read did I borrow? At least 90% of them, probably higher than that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angel: Unfortunately, I have no record&#8230; Mysteries include some lightweight but fun page-turners (the &#8220;Burglar Who&#8230;&#8221; series by Lawrence Block); SF includes, well, some fantasy (several of Pratchett&#8217;s Discworld books, but I&#8217;m caught up other than the 8 trade paperbacks I own and haven&#8217;t yet read, #s 21-28 in the series).</p>
<p>18 subscriptions is fewer than I have had at times, particularly in terms of amount of text and number of issues. That includes five travel-related, three stereo &#038; home theater-related, two business-related (paid for with miles) and one PC-related (down from five at one point).</p>
<p>The other SF magazine? I&#8217;m shocked: The oldest of them all: Analog. (I think it still has the highest circulation also, although Asimov&#8217;s&#8211;same publisher&#8211;might be higher. Unfortunately, &#8220;highest&#8221; these days is still pathetic, under 20,000, I think.)</p>
<p>How many of the books I read did I borrow? At least 90% of them, probably higher than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2011/01/2010-reading-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-53830</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 21:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2862#comment-53830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would be curious to see what you read for the year, at least in the nonfiction and the sf parts. 

Wow, 18 mags. subscriptions. That seems like a lot to me, but I do like you include the science fiction ones (what is left these days? Asimov&#039;s. SF&amp;F, I know. What else? Again, curious).

And speaking of lists, I should have mine out soon. This year I decided to count how many books I borrowed (public lib, my workplace, where I try to read some of the books I select when I can select, and via ILL). I think that is one thing I would be curious as well: are people borrowing books more? Or less? I know some of the people posting their lists mentioning they are reading more on e-readers. 

Hope your year is getting to a good start. As always, 

Best, and keep on blogging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be curious to see what you read for the year, at least in the nonfiction and the sf parts. </p>
<p>Wow, 18 mags. subscriptions. That seems like a lot to me, but I do like you include the science fiction ones (what is left these days? Asimov&#8217;s. SF&amp;F, I know. What else? Again, curious).</p>
<p>And speaking of lists, I should have mine out soon. This year I decided to count how many books I borrowed (public lib, my workplace, where I try to read some of the books I select when I can select, and via ILL). I think that is one thing I would be curious as well: are people borrowing books more? Or less? I know some of the people posting their lists mentioning they are reading more on e-readers. </p>
<p>Hope your year is getting to a good start. As always, </p>
<p>Best, and keep on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
