<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And we should trust our computer security to you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-50970</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2739#comment-50970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess I think of &quot;anti-virus&quot; and &quot;malware-killer&quot; as being the same product. I&#039;m migrating to Microsoft Security Essentials and the Windows firewall, and we&#039;ll see how it goes. Maintaining multiple subscription products is really a bother... and, of course, &quot;a little update time&quot; depends on what else you need to be doing at that point. I&#039;m certainly not arguing with your decision *not* to have a name-brand security suite!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I think of &#8220;anti-virus&#8221; and &#8220;malware-killer&#8221; as being the same product. I&#8217;m migrating to Microsoft Security Essentials and the Windows firewall, and we&#8217;ll see how it goes. Maintaining multiple subscription products is really a bother&#8230; and, of course, &#8220;a little update time&#8221; depends on what else you need to be doing at that point. I&#8217;m certainly not arguing with your decision *not* to have a name-brand security suite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahniwa</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-50968</link>
		<dc:creator>ahniwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2739#comment-50968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your points are valid, of course, but that&#039;s exactly why I&#039;d argue against a protection suite and for standalone products instead. Keep your anti-virus and your firewall and your malware-killer in separate baskets, so to speak, and it won&#039;t be such a big deal if one malfunctions or, in this case, needs to take a little update time.

Re: your more recent post, McAfee sounds like a nightmare and now I&#039;m double-glad that I don&#039;t bother to buy &quot;premium&quot; security suites. It may work well for you, but it really seems like a racket to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your points are valid, of course, but that&#8217;s exactly why I&#8217;d argue against a protection suite and for standalone products instead. Keep your anti-virus and your firewall and your malware-killer in separate baskets, so to speak, and it won&#8217;t be such a big deal if one malfunctions or, in this case, needs to take a little update time.</p>
<p>Re: your more recent post, McAfee sounds like a nightmare and now I&#8217;m double-glad that I don&#8217;t bother to buy &#8220;premium&#8221; security suites. It may work well for you, but it really seems like a racket to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-50830</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2739#comment-50830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Rescued from spam: Spam Karma 2 thinks tumblr is a wasteland of spam...]

Honestly? I encountered malware when checking out a supposed liblog. If you disable your protection suite, &quot;malware scanners, built-in Windows protection, and antivirus&quot; simply aren&#039;t there. Sure, the router and Windows firewalls are there.

Would I be this cautious? Hard to say, but it&#039;s not my machine. Is my wife being paranoid? No, I don&#039;t think so; based on past experience, &quot;the virus-bots are waiting just outside the door for that antivirus to go away&quot; isn&#039;t too far off the mark. And, as I say, the work she does on her notebook requires her to visit sites that might be sketchy by some standards. (Consider the first line of this comment: at least one plugin considers tumblr to be sketchy.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Rescued from spam: Spam Karma 2 thinks tumblr is a wasteland of spam...]</p>
<p>Honestly? I encountered malware when checking out a supposed liblog. If you disable your protection suite, &#8220;malware scanners, built-in Windows protection, and antivirus&#8221; simply aren&#8217;t there. Sure, the router and Windows firewalls are there.</p>
<p>Would I be this cautious? Hard to say, but it&#8217;s not my machine. Is my wife being paranoid? No, I don&#8217;t think so; based on past experience, &#8220;the virus-bots are waiting just outside the door for that antivirus to go away&#8221; isn&#8217;t too far off the mark. And, as I say, the work she does on her notebook requires her to visit sites that might be sketchy by some standards. (Consider the first line of this comment: at least one plugin considers tumblr to be sketchy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahniwa</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/11/and-we-should-trust-our-computer-security-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-50798</link>
		<dc:creator>ahniwa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2739#comment-50798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farce, comedy, tragedy ... it seems like an overreaction. Not in terms of being frustrated with McAfee support - by all means, I was frustrated just reading about it, and I&#039;ve devoted similar blog posts in the past to the same purpose.

But honestly, having to uninstall your antivirus for a short period of time isn&#039;t likely to kill your machine. I don&#039;t feel like the virus-bots are waiting just outside the door for that antivirus to go away. There&#039;s a lot of redundancy in protection from most threats (if you&#039;re not actively surfing questionable sites), in terms of hardware firewalls, software firewalls, malware scanners, built-in Windows protection, and antivirus.

If you&#039;re really concerned, you could always download the new package (but not install), run a full scan, unplug from the web, uninstall the old package, restart, install the new package, plug back into the web, and you&#039;re done.

I&#039;m probably missing some of the complexities here, but it still feels a little paranoid, to me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farce, comedy, tragedy &#8230; it seems like an overreaction. Not in terms of being frustrated with McAfee support &#8211; by all means, I was frustrated just reading about it, and I&#8217;ve devoted similar blog posts in the past to the same purpose.</p>
<p>But honestly, having to uninstall your antivirus for a short period of time isn&#8217;t likely to kill your machine. I don&#8217;t feel like the virus-bots are waiting just outside the door for that antivirus to go away. There&#8217;s a lot of redundancy in protection from most threats (if you&#8217;re not actively surfing questionable sites), in terms of hardware firewalls, software firewalls, malware scanners, built-in Windows protection, and antivirus.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really concerned, you could always download the new package (but not install), run a full scan, unplug from the web, uninstall the old package, restart, install the new package, plug back into the web, and you&#8217;re done.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m probably missing some of the complexities here, but it still feels a little paranoid, to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
