<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solutions looking for problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2010/08/solutions-looking-for-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/08/solutions-looking-for-problems/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/08/solutions-looking-for-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45776</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 17:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2458#comment-45776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John: Interesting. So along with problogging we have protweeting--and have probably had it all along. Since I&#039;m not on Twitter (at the moment), I&#039;ve been spared.

I should note that, in a comment on a blog post lamenting the death of Wave, a commenter--who&#039;s sorry to see Wave go--said it was solving problems we didn&#039;t know we had. I&#039;m deeply suspicious of &quot;problems we didn&#039;t know we had&quot; as anything other than the basis for thousands of commercial products and billions of dollars in advertising to convince us of these heretofore-unknown &quot;problems.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: Interesting. So along with problogging we have protweeting&#8211;and have probably had it all along. Since I&#8217;m not on Twitter (at the moment), I&#8217;ve been spared.</p>
<p>I should note that, in a comment on a blog post lamenting the death of Wave, a commenter&#8211;who&#8217;s sorry to see Wave go&#8211;said it was solving problems we didn&#8217;t know we had. I&#8217;m deeply suspicious of &#8220;problems we didn&#8217;t know we had&#8221; as anything other than the basis for thousands of commercial products and billions of dollars in advertising to convince us of these heretofore-unknown &#8220;problems.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dupuis</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/08/solutions-looking-for-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45766</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 15:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2458#comment-45766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of twitter, it seems that Jay Rosen puts an awful lot of effort into crafting his posts: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/What-I-Read-Jay-Rosen-1735&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/What-I-Read-Jay-Rosen-1735&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s the 3rd paragraph of his response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of twitter, it seems that Jay Rosen puts an awful lot of effort into crafting his posts: <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/What-I-Read-Jay-Rosen-1735" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlanticwire.com/features/view/feature/What-I-Read-Jay-Rosen-1735</a>.  It&#8217;s the 3rd paragraph of his response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moogie</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/08/solutions-looking-for-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-45741</link>
		<dc:creator>moogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 05:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=2458#comment-45741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the time, I think that the process of writing (and editing) is more important than the final result.  But I have too much free time.

For me, it is more about the process than the result.  Which facts or quotes that were considered but didn&#039;t get included....  yeah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the time, I think that the process of writing (and editing) is more important than the final result.  But I have too much free time.</p>
<p>For me, it is more about the process than the result.  Which facts or quotes that were considered but didn&#8217;t get included&#8230;.  yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
