<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old Flicks: What&#8217;s Next?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42773</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horror, the horror!

Maybe I should clarify one thing: Whatever I pick, I&#039;ll be alternating with the Mystery Collection--and with 51 more discs to go in that set, that will be true for all four of the collections. (One disc of mysteries, one disc of whatever else, and so on.) And, unless it appears that it&#039;s a different-quality print, I don&#039;t re-watch movies I&#039;ve already seen, which means the Legends of Horror set is effectively a 30-movie set for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The horror, the horror!</p>
<p>Maybe I should clarify one thing: Whatever I pick, I&#8217;ll be alternating with the Mystery Collection&#8211;and with 51 more discs to go in that set, that will be true for all four of the collections. (One disc of mysteries, one disc of whatever else, and so on.) And, unless it appears that it&#8217;s a different-quality print, I don&#8217;t re-watch movies I&#8217;ve already seen, which means the Legends of Horror set is effectively a 30-movie set for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42768</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would probably go for the horror, but that&#039;s because it is what I like. I liked Mr. Golrick&#039;s idea of just going in order, so you alternate what you watch. Or maybe just pick first the package with the least amount of movies you have seen already. 

Best, and keep on blogging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would probably go for the horror, but that&#8217;s because it is what I like. I liked Mr. Golrick&#8217;s idea of just going in order, so you alternate what you watch. Or maybe just pick first the package with the least amount of movies you have seen already. </p>
<p>Best, and keep on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42766</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bob: Well, this is part of an ongoing process--what used to be my &quot;staying on the treadmill&quot; routine (before we got rid of the treadmill, replaced by daily walks). *Real* movie watching (Netflix) is a little different.

Interesting start. Notably, Mill Creek has a *lot* of horror sets--&quot;Chilling&quot; 50 Movie Pack, &quot;Horror Classics&quot;--both a 50-movie pack and a 100-movie pack, &quot;Nightmare Worlds&quot; (more scifi/horror) 50-movie pack and some 20-movie packs. (As for cheesy, SciFi Classics was a *great* set--and also has some really interesting flicks in it.)

More comments? Different views? (Am I really up to Shirley Temple?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob: Well, this is part of an ongoing process&#8211;what used to be my &#8220;staying on the treadmill&#8221; routine (before we got rid of the treadmill, replaced by daily walks). *Real* movie watching (Netflix) is a little different.</p>
<p>Interesting start. Notably, Mill Creek has a *lot* of horror sets&#8211;&#8221;Chilling&#8221; 50 Movie Pack, &#8220;Horror Classics&#8221;&#8211;both a 50-movie pack and a 100-movie pack, &#8220;Nightmare Worlds&#8221; (more scifi/horror) 50-movie pack and some 20-movie packs. (As for cheesy, SciFi Classics was a *great* set&#8211;and also has some really interesting flicks in it.)</p>
<p>More comments? Different views? (Am I really up to Shirley Temple?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Watson</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42765</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow.  I know that I couldn&#039;t *plan* my movie watching so far in advance ... but if I had a couple hours open I&#039;d likely choose a comedy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I know that I couldn&#8217;t *plan* my movie watching so far in advance &#8230; but if I had a couple hours open I&#8217;d likely choose a comedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Golrick</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42764</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Golrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d do them in the order that they are listed. You start off light and fluffy with Shirley, get a whole change of pace with the horror, move back to light with the comedy, and wind up with a general potpourri. That seems like pacing and variety....enjoy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d do them in the order that they are listed. You start off light and fluffy with Shirley, get a whole change of pace with the horror, move back to light with the comedy, and wind up with a general potpourri. That seems like pacing and variety&#8230;.enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horror!  I did my thesis on horror fiction with a side project on horror film.  It was a fun project with many nights of triple-feature monsters and mayhem.  (those movies are usually better with the MST3K robots making snarky comments, though).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horror!  I did my thesis on horror fiction with a side project on horror film.  It was a fun project with many nights of triple-feature monsters and mayhem.  (those movies are usually better with the MST3K robots making snarky comments, though).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dupuis</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2010/03/old-flicks-whats-next/comment-page-1/#comment-42758</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 04:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1906#comment-42758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d go for the horror flicks, but that&#039;s just me.  I love old horror flicks, the cheesier the better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d go for the horror flicks, but that&#8217;s just me.  I love old horror flicks, the cheesier the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
