Comments on: Cites & Insights 2010: A Third Option?

By: laura

laura — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:51:20 +0000

I’m fond of the original Berkeley, but as I’m most likely to read C&I via HTML + Readability, it hardly matters.

By: Kathryn

Kathryn — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:34:37 +0000

Oh my goodness, but the Constantia typeface is so much easier to read! It’s really apparent when looked at side-by-side. I definitely prefer that option.

By: Blake

Blake — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:44:44 +0000

For me it’s flip a coin and go with the heads. They all look fine.

By: Michelle

Michelle — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:59:04 +0000

Still like Constantia.

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:48:04 +0000

The 3rd option is nicer for on screen reading as you mention as it does seem darker.

The only thing I noticed though with a fairly cursory look was the ugly, overly “fat” 9s. Hard to believe they are so different between the 2 Berkeley’s but they are. Again, I imagine I’d get use to reading them though.