<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The photovoltaic paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/the-photovoltaic-paradox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/the-photovoltaic-paradox/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/the-photovoltaic-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-40803</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1588#comment-40803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. Yeah, I&#039;d think Alaska would be a little marginal for solar--great long days in the summer, but a terrible efficiency factor. 

Actually, a lot of PG&amp;E&#039;s power is hydro, but it&#039;s almost all &quot;big hydro,&quot; and that has other consequences. (One good thing: Essentially zero coalfired generation.)

The good news: Even though the legislature didn&#039;t pass the bill requiring utilities to take rooftop solar up to 5% of their overall capacity (as opposed to the current 2.5%), PG&amp;E agreed to unilaterally change that to a 3.5% level--otherwise, photovoltaic would get a *lot* less desirable for new customers in about a year, since PG&amp;E wouldn&#039;t be required to buy excess generation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Yeah, I&#8217;d think Alaska would be a little marginal for solar&#8211;great long days in the summer, but a terrible efficiency factor. </p>
<p>Actually, a lot of PG&#038;E&#8217;s power is hydro, but it&#8217;s almost all &#8220;big hydro,&#8221; and that has other consequences. (One good thing: Essentially zero coalfired generation.)</p>
<p>The good news: Even though the legislature didn&#8217;t pass the bill requiring utilities to take rooftop solar up to 5% of their overall capacity (as opposed to the current 2.5%), PG&#038;E agreed to unilaterally change that to a 3.5% level&#8211;otherwise, photovoltaic would get a *lot* less desirable for new customers in about a year, since PG&#038;E wouldn&#8217;t be required to buy excess generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/the-photovoltaic-paradox/comment-page-1/#comment-40785</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1588#comment-40785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on doing a part to lead the country to energy independence and for sharing how metering is affecting your usage.

Southeast Alaska is rated very low for solar or I&#039;d be pushing my condo board on it. At least we have hydro up here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on doing a part to lead the country to energy independence and for sharing how metering is affecting your usage.</p>
<p>Southeast Alaska is rated very low for solar or I&#8217;d be pushing my condo board on it. At least we have hydro up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
