<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Learning: A Reprint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/on-learning-a-reprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/on-learning-a-reprint/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/on-learning-a-reprint/comment-page-1/#comment-40941</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1619#comment-40941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David: If I knew the answer, I&#039;d have more than a blog post or C&amp;I essay--I&#039;d become a specialized consultant. But with that blowing-off-a-legitimate-question response out of the way...

I suspect that one thing the choir needs to do is tone it down a little bit: Back off from &quot;all of you gotta learn a and b and c and ... aa and bb and cc, RIGHT NOW, &#039;cause otherwise YOUR LIBRARY&#039;s GONNA DIE!&quot; (That&#039;s exaggerated, but maybe not much.) Guilt won&#039;t do it. Shame won&#039;t do it. Yelling at people won&#039;t do it. 

The goal is, or should be, to have a community of awareness within each library and to have (most) librarians and library staff engaged at some level--not necessarily &quot;future of the library&quot; but some level of learning. 

How do you get near-universal buy-in? You probably don&#039;t (consider the percentage of so-called professional librarians who don&#039;t belong to any professional organization and don&#039;t read any professional publications, blogs, or websites: I don&#039;t know the number, but I&#039;d bet it&#039;s close to 50%). 

Improving the percentage (or lowering the negative percentage)? No easy answer, no single answer. Worth thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: If I knew the answer, I&#8217;d have more than a blog post or C&#038;I essay&#8211;I&#8217;d become a specialized consultant. But with that blowing-off-a-legitimate-question response out of the way&#8230;</p>
<p>I suspect that one thing the choir needs to do is tone it down a little bit: Back off from &#8220;all of you gotta learn a and b and c and &#8230; aa and bb and cc, RIGHT NOW, &#8217;cause otherwise YOUR LIBRARY&#8217;s GONNA DIE!&#8221; (That&#8217;s exaggerated, but maybe not much.) Guilt won&#8217;t do it. Shame won&#8217;t do it. Yelling at people won&#8217;t do it. </p>
<p>The goal is, or should be, to have a community of awareness within each library and to have (most) librarians and library staff engaged at some level&#8211;not necessarily &#8220;future of the library&#8221; but some level of learning. </p>
<p>How do you get near-universal buy-in? You probably don&#8217;t (consider the percentage of so-called professional librarians who don&#8217;t belong to any professional organization and don&#8217;t read any professional publications, blogs, or websites: I don&#8217;t know the number, but I&#8217;d bet it&#8217;s close to 50%). </p>
<p>Improving the percentage (or lowering the negative percentage)? No easy answer, no single answer. Worth thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david lee king</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/11/on-learning-a-reprint/comment-page-1/#comment-40938</link>
		<dc:creator>david lee king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1619#comment-40938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt - most definitely agree with you on all points above - nice thoughts! My question, one I&#039;ve been attempting to wrap my brain around, is this - what do you DO about that?

So - many libraries seem to have &quot;those people&quot; - staff that have stopped learning. Oh, maybe they&#039;re still learning about their favorite hobby or something ... but when it comes to &quot;future of the library&quot; type stuff, they seem to have stopped (my experience, anyway). 

I&#039;d love to see some of us &quot;choir&quot; types you&#039;re preaching to tackle that problem! We know they&#039;re out there - but what can be done about them? How do you, at the least, lead the proverbial horse to the water?

I think the profession would move forward quite a bit if a majority of libraries could adequately tackle this.

Hmm... sounds like a blog post... :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt &#8211; most definitely agree with you on all points above &#8211; nice thoughts! My question, one I&#8217;ve been attempting to wrap my brain around, is this &#8211; what do you DO about that?</p>
<p>So &#8211; many libraries seem to have &#8220;those people&#8221; &#8211; staff that have stopped learning. Oh, maybe they&#8217;re still learning about their favorite hobby or something &#8230; but when it comes to &#8220;future of the library&#8221; type stuff, they seem to have stopped (my experience, anyway). </p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to see some of us &#8220;choir&#8221; types you&#8217;re preaching to tackle that problem! We know they&#8217;re out there &#8211; but what can be done about them? How do you, at the least, lead the proverbial horse to the water?</p>
<p>I think the profession would move forward quite a bit if a majority of libraries could adequately tackle this.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; sounds like a blog post&#8230; <img src='http://walt.lishost.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
