<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trends &amp; Quick Takes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Crawford</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/comment-page-1/#comment-39604</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 21:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/#comment-39604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Markk: I get the 99% number from Nielsen&#039;s latest studies (&lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/05/despite-rise-in-streaming-99-of-all-video-watched-on-a-tv.ars&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;as in this &#039;&#039;Ars Technica&#039;&#039; report&lt;/a&gt;--but you&#039;re right, I added an erroneous qualifier. That 99% (98.8%) is video viewed on a television, and certainly includes DVD, DVR, videocassettes, etc. I&#039;ve fixed the post--and thanks for noting the error. (It&#039;s a mistake I shouldn&#039;t have made: During the summer, at least, we watch a whole lot more video from DVD than from cable.)
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Markk: I get the 99% number from Nielsen&#8217;s latest studies (<a href="http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/05/despite-rise-in-streaming-99-of-all-video-watched-on-a-tv.ars" rel="nofollow">as in this &#8221;Ars Technica&#8221; report</a>&#8211;but you&#8217;re right, I added an erroneous qualifier. That 99% (98.8%) is video viewed on a television, and certainly includes DVD, DVR, videocassettes, etc. I&#8217;ve fixed the post&#8211;and thanks for noting the error. (It&#8217;s a mistake I shouldn&#8217;t have made: During the summer, at least, we watch a whole lot more video from DVD than from cable.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markk</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/comment-page-1/#comment-39603</link>
		<dc:creator>Markk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/2009/06/trends-quick-takes/#comment-39603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are you getting the 99% number? I don&#039;t believe it. DVD alone is way more than 1% of video watching.  There is a reason Google is losing $500M this year on youtube and spends about $1,000,000 a day for bandwidth, people watch them. Personally I watch about as much sports online as I do off and that is by far the most live TV I watch now. The Masters golf tournament had great online TV this year. All the rest you say is more than true of course.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you getting the 99% number? I don&#8217;t believe it. DVD alone is way more than 1% of video watching.  There is a reason Google is losing $500M this year on youtube and spends about $1,000,000 a day for bandwidth, people watch them. Personally I watch about as much sports online as I do off and that is by far the most live TV I watch now. The Masters golf tournament had great online TV this year. All the rest you say is more than true of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
