<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming back, possibly slowly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/coming-back-possibly-slowly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/coming-back-possibly-slowly/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/coming-back-possibly-slowly/comment-page-1/#comment-37581</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1280#comment-37581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Administrivia isn&#039;t a problem: Lulu and CreateSpace handle all of that. Publicity (and cachet, or at least &quot;being professionally published&quot;) are what N-S and ALA Editions and ITI provide--along with editing and a time delay (and other things, mostly good).

I doubt very much that a library publisher would do a traditional edition of any of those books, since they&#039;ve already been out for a while and have demonstrated &lt;b&gt;lack&lt;/b&gt; of demand. The time delay was one reason I didn&#039;t approach them in the first place.

I do plan an essay on the self-publishing experiment. It reminded me that I&#039;m not an entrepreneur or proper publicist by nature. It hasn&#039;t been entirely a failure...but certainly not mostly successful either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Administrivia isn&#8217;t a problem: Lulu and CreateSpace handle all of that. Publicity (and cachet, or at least &#8220;being professionally published&#8221;) are what N-S and ALA Editions and ITI provide&#8211;along with editing and a time delay (and other things, mostly good).</p>
<p>I doubt very much that a library publisher would do a traditional edition of any of those books, since they&#8217;ve already been out for a while and have demonstrated <b>lack</b> of demand. The time delay was one reason I didn&#8217;t approach them in the first place.</p>
<p>I do plan an essay on the self-publishing experiment. It reminded me that I&#8217;m not an entrepreneur or proper publicist by nature. It hasn&#8217;t been entirely a failure&#8230;but certainly not mostly successful either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Kaye</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/coming-back-possibly-slowly/comment-page-1/#comment-37580</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 19:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1280#comment-37580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Worth placing the books with a Neal-Schumann or other specialist publisher, so they can handle all the administrivia (even if you get a smaller share of revenues)?

And now I promise I&#039;ll shut up about this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worth placing the books with a Neal-Schumann or other specialist publisher, so they can handle all the administrivia (even if you get a smaller share of revenues)?</p>
<p>And now I promise I&#8217;ll shut up about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
