<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Citizendium and the memory of water</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/citizendium-and-the-memory-of-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/citizendium-and-the-memory-of-water/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Harriss</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/05/citizendium-and-the-memory-of-water/comment-page-1/#comment-37426</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2009 21:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1255#comment-37426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One wonders if the memory of water article would have been corrected if you had not drawn attention to it.  

The homeopathy article is presently the exact same text as the distressing version you commented on earlier: as an &quot;approved&quot; article, it is frozen until it goes through the approval process all over again.  Perhaps a defect of the Citizendium model is that paradoxically, errors are easily fixed in their &quot;unapproved&quot; articles (such as memory of water), while the supposedly higher-quality &quot;approved&quot; articles (such as homeopathy)  retain errors and distortions because the process of changing them is so cumbersome.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wonders if the memory of water article would have been corrected if you had not drawn attention to it.  </p>
<p>The homeopathy article is presently the exact same text as the distressing version you commented on earlier: as an &#8220;approved&#8221; article, it is frozen until it goes through the approval process all over again.  Perhaps a defect of the Citizendium model is that paradoxically, errors are easily fixed in their &#8220;unapproved&#8221; articles (such as memory of water), while the supposedly higher-quality &#8220;approved&#8221; articles (such as homeopathy)  retain errors and distortions because the process of changing them is so cumbersome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
