Comments on: 2. Blogging for Libraries http://walt.lishost.org/2009/02/2-blogging-for-libraries/ The library voice of the radical middle. Fri, 24 May 2013 04:22:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: walt http://walt.lishost.org/2009/02/2-blogging-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-36054 walt Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:58:22 +0000 http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1097#comment-36054 Leigh Anne,

Thanks. I guess I thought there was plenty of advice out there already (in books and on blogs), but maybe not.

Mark: Thanks. I’ll keep that in mind. (#2 is probably #3 in likelihood at this point…or maybe #4, since “doing nothing” is sounding good.)

]]> By: Leigh Anne http://walt.lishost.org/2009/02/2-blogging-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-36052 Leigh Anne Sun, 01 Mar 2009 18:58:55 +0000 http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1097#comment-36052 Am highly biased here, as I’m both the nominal blogwrangler and collection developer in the Zs @ my library. However, I’d say that, in the interest of making sales AND helping professional development, any book that gave concrete suggestions for better blogging would get snapped up by both the library school AND public library markets.

]]> By: Mark http://walt.lishost.org/2009/02/2-blogging-for-libraries/comment-page-1/#comment-36038 Mark Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:11:25 +0000 http://walt.lishost.org/?p=1097#comment-36038 I’m not the market for either of these, Walt, but they do not seem to me like the best use of your time. And based on sales-to-date I’d have to ask why “invest” the effort?

Our library (UIUC) has a copy of the public one but not of the academic one. Go figure. Consortium-wide there are 3 copies of the public and 0 of the academic.

]]>