<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe not the best ever, but perhaps the most surprising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2009/01/maybe-not-the-best-ever-but-perhaps-the-most-surprising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/01/maybe-not-the-best-ever-but-perhaps-the-most-surprising/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2009/01/maybe-not-the-best-ever-but-perhaps-the-most-surprising/comment-page-1/#comment-35388</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=961#comment-35388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was a great issue, and, I believe, the precursor to many of us saying, &quot;so I reviewed the literature -- by which I mean the blogs.&quot; (I think the line first showed up on Uncontrolled Vocabulary, but I could be wrong about that. Anyway, this C&amp;I provides the intellectual justification for that practice elegantly and eloquently.) As for the surprise, well, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a lot of correlation between how well a writer&#039;s life is going and how well he&#039;s writing. I say this both as someone who used to write and as someone who has read a &lt;i&gt;lot&lt;/i&gt; of biographies of writers and has observed more than a few of them at close range.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a great issue, and, I believe, the precursor to many of us saying, &#8220;so I reviewed the literature &#8212; by which I mean the blogs.&#8221; (I think the line first showed up on Uncontrolled Vocabulary, but I could be wrong about that. Anyway, this C&amp;I provides the intellectual justification for that practice elegantly and eloquently.) As for the surprise, well, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a lot of correlation between how well a writer&#8217;s life is going and how well he&#8217;s writing. I say this both as someone who used to write and as someone who has read a <i>lot</i> of biographies of writers and has observed more than a few of them at close range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
