because i love you, walt, that’s why… :+)

> in most consumer electronics situations,
> companies DO announce sales numbers,
> particularly when they’re in
> any way positive.

ok. i agree, in large part.

and the numbers for these gadgets
are _not_ “positive”, as numbers go.

20 million iphones — not even counting the
ipod touches — now _that_ is one “positive”
number, especially over a mere 18 months…

but 300,000 units? over more-or-less 3 years?
well, not so “positive”. especially considering
that sony probably made about $10 per unit.
and that’s _before_ they figure in the cost of
their marketing. if there were to count that,
they’re in the red on this project, _deep_ red.

indeed, if this gadget wasn’t the passion of
their c.e.o., it would’ve already been canned.

> I find it really odd that you find
> $100 million in sales trivial, where you say
> “e-book publishers report healthy sales.”

oh, c’mon, walt. that’s apples and oranges…

$100 million in sales is indeed “trivial” when
your costs are between $90 and $110 million.
especially for a gigantic electronics company,
with sales (maybe even profit) in the billions.
it’s in the realm of petty-cash.

e-book publishers, on the other hand, are just
some small furry mammals scurrying around.
their costs are minimal. heck, their _variable_
costs approach zero. but even their fixed costs
are low. so any sales — at all — are welcome…
and any upward trend — at all — is happiness.

> I can’t imagine any ebook publisher
> who wouldn’t be jumping for joy
> with $100 million sales.

even random house would like to see a figure
like “$100 million” for their electronic-books…
since they wouldn’t spend _anywhere_near_
$90 to $110 million in creating those e-books.

-bowerbird

I’d love to be in a position where $100 million is a trifle not even to be worth noting…but that’s not even the point.

The point is that, in most consumer electronics situations, companies DO announce sales numbers, particularly when they’re in any way positive. And Sony has done so–even though the numbers are only positive when compared to previous generations of dedicated ebook readers.

I find it really odd that you find $100 million in sales trivial, where you say “e-book publishers report healthy sales.” Seen any estimates for the total size of the ebook (as text) market lately? I can’t imagine any ebook publisher who wouldn’t be jumping for joy with $100 million sales.

that’s hardly anything to write home about;
sony is losing their shirt on that machine…

and amazon isn’t doing much better either.
(though oprah helped them out immensely.)

the good news is that both of these projects
have strong support at the highest levels of
the companies — at the very _top_, in fact –
because they recognize the long-term value.

after far too many companies sought to use
slash-and-burn to establish a first-to-market
position they could use to make a monopoly,
this stick-to-it attitude is _a_welcome_relief_,
and thus we should _praise_their_attitude_,
instead of condemning them for not satisfying
our curiosity, even if it is well-meaning (and
i fail to see how we’d make even that claim)…

for the more-important questions on whether
these machine-owners are buying _e-books_,
and enjoying the experience, the answers are
crystal-clear, especially concerning the kindle.
word-of-mouth is almost unequivocally good,
and e-book publishers report healthy sales…

i’d say you and i have more important things
to be worried about than these sales numbers.

-bowerbird