<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three metaposts in one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:48:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-33254</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=819#comment-33254</guid>
		<description>Laura,

Technically, you&#039;re probably right. 

Realistically, it doesn&#039;t feel to me as though most tweets are intended to function like (most contemporary) blog posts. 

I guess, to me, that &quot;microblogs&quot; has the same feel that &quot;miniarticles&quot; would if you applied it to blog posts... Maybe technically justifiable, but it &lt;i&gt;feels&lt;/i&gt; wrong--to me. As always, YMMV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura,</p>
<p>Technically, you&#8217;re probably right. </p>
<p>Realistically, it doesn&#8217;t feel to me as though most tweets are intended to function like (most contemporary) blog posts. </p>
<p>I guess, to me, that &#8220;microblogs&#8221; has the same feel that &#8220;miniarticles&#8221; would if you applied it to blog posts&#8230; Maybe technically justifiable, but it <i>feels</i> wrong&#8211;to me. As always, YMMV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-33253</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=819#comment-33253</guid>
		<description>Well, if you take blogging to mean posts arranged on a web page in reverse chronological order and with an RSS feed, then it seems as though &quot;microblogging&quot; would mean the same thing, only much smaller. If much smaller is taken to mean &quot;much shorter posts,&quot; then I don&#039;t see why one couldn&#039;t call Twitter microblogging.  If you start to define blogs by their content, I think you run into a lot of problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you take blogging to mean posts arranged on a web page in reverse chronological order and with an RSS feed, then it seems as though &#8220;microblogging&#8221; would mean the same thing, only much smaller. If much smaller is taken to mean &#8220;much shorter posts,&#8221; then I don&#8217;t see why one couldn&#8217;t call Twitter microblogging.  If you start to define blogs by their content, I think you run into a lot of problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-33252</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=819#comment-33252</guid>
		<description>Christina,

In practice, very few posts and articles that I need will disappear in the three to nine months (esp. with caching). If I thought they would, then, yes, I&#039;d use one of these programs.

My little fix basically reduces my paper use (and, of course, this being Mountain View and us being us, I was already recycling all the paper--and it&#039;s frequently part-recycled paper to begin with) and gives me what I need. (And helps keep the folders from overflowing!)

Well, with conference reporting, there&#039;s another issue: Liveblogging. I have to admit that I find liveblog conference reports extremely frustrating as compared to reports put together after the fact. I think they get more of the words, but I feel like I get less of the meaning...but, again, that&#039;s just me.

Paul,

Had to rescue your comment from Spam Karma 2 (you had three links and haven&#039;t commented here recently). If the new-blog creation rate is falling, that would make perfectly good sense. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christina,</p>
<p>In practice, very few posts and articles that I need will disappear in the three to nine months (esp. with caching). If I thought they would, then, yes, I&#8217;d use one of these programs.</p>
<p>My little fix basically reduces my paper use (and, of course, this being Mountain View and us being us, I was already recycling all the paper&#8211;and it&#8217;s frequently part-recycled paper to begin with) and gives me what I need. (And helps keep the folders from overflowing!)</p>
<p>Well, with conference reporting, there&#8217;s another issue: Liveblogging. I have to admit that I find liveblog conference reports extremely frustrating as compared to reports put together after the fact. I think they get more of the words, but I feel like I get less of the meaning&#8230;but, again, that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Had to rescue your comment from Spam Karma 2 (you had three links and haven&#8217;t commented here recently). If the new-blog creation rate is falling, that would make perfectly good sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul R. Pival</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-33251</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul R. Pival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 14:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=819#comment-33251</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I&#039;ve been waiting for Sifry to publish another State of the Blogosphere report (last one was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000493.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;April 2007&lt;/a&gt;) and thought maybe he had when Technorati was cited in the figures above.  Did some checking and it seems the 175,000 blogs created daily statistic is taken from his &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/2100-1025_3-6102935.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2006 report&lt;/a&gt;!  The more recent 2007 report actually cites &quot;only&quot; 120,000 created per day.  The 113,000 tracked comes from an &lt;a href=&quot;http://technorati.com/about/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;undated page&lt;/a&gt;, (one still citing the 175,000 number)  though seems reasonably more than the 70 million blogs tracked mentioned in the 2007 report.  I couldn&#039;t find any mention of the 7.5 million active blogs on the Technorati site...  :-/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I&#8217;ve been waiting for Sifry to publish another State of the Blogosphere report (last one was <a href="http://www.sifry.com/alerts/archives/000493.html" rel="nofollow">April 2007</a>) and thought maybe he had when Technorati was cited in the figures above.  Did some checking and it seems the 175,000 blogs created daily statistic is taken from his <a href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1025_3-6102935.html" rel="nofollow">2006 report</a>!  The more recent 2007 report actually cites &#8220;only&#8221; 120,000 created per day.  The 113,000 tracked comes from an <a href="http://technorati.com/about/" rel="nofollow">undated page</a>, (one still citing the 175,000 number)  though seems reasonably more than the 70 million blogs tracked mentioned in the 2007 report.  I couldn&#8217;t find any mention of the 7.5 million active blogs on the Technorati site&#8230;  :-/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Pikas</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/07/three-metaposts-in-one/comment-page-1/#comment-33250</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Pikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=819#comment-33250</guid>
		<description>wrt printing and then referring to the original - I know both Gary Price and Mary Ellen Bates have highlighted various programs that allow you to bookmark and cache a copy - some with highlighting and notes... maybe something like that would help? - I mean, I know you said that you want paper, but that would capture an online copy for cutting and pasting.
wrt microblogging - I agree.  I definitely prefer &quot;real&quot; blogging for conference reporting in particular - much more meaty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wrt printing and then referring to the original &#8211; I know both Gary Price and Mary Ellen Bates have highlighted various programs that allow you to bookmark and cache a copy &#8211; some with highlighting and notes&#8230; maybe something like that would help? &#8211; I mean, I know you said that you want paper, but that would capture an online copy for cutting and pasting.<br />
wrt microblogging &#8211; I agree.  I definitely prefer &#8220;real&#8221; blogging for conference reporting in particular &#8211; much more meaty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

