<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oops: Loosening a personal stricture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2008/03/oops-loosening-a-personal-stricture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/03/oops-loosening-a-personal-stricture/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/03/oops-loosening-a-personal-stricture/comment-page-1/#comment-32346</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=745#comment-32346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi John,

I treat this blog somewhat differently than I treat Cites &amp; Insights, which I regard as a &lt;strong&gt;publication&lt;/strong&gt;--and, as such, &quot;fixed&quot; once it&#039;s published.

But given that I&#039;m fortunate enough to have a fair number of comments, I also treat this blog as semi-fixed. Which is to say, it wouldn&#039;t occur to me to delete old entries, and when I make changes, they&#039;re &lt;strike&gt;almost alwaysÂ  &lt;/strike&gt;usually clearly marked as changes--with the stupid old text crossed out (but still visible), or with a new section introduced with an &lt;strong&gt;Update:&lt;/strong&gt; flag.

That&#039;s me. I don&#039;t at all suggest that it&#039;s what anyone else should do. I&#039;m not even convinced I&#039;m &quot;right.&quot; So far, it&#039;s what I&#039;m most comfortable with.

&lt;b&gt;Almost immediate update:&lt;/b&gt; For simple typos, I&#039;m likely just to fix them here. And, in this case, I did the same at C&amp;I. I might do that more often in the future.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John,</p>
<p>I treat this blog somewhat differently than I treat Cites &#038; Insights, which I regard as a <strong>publication</strong>&#8211;and, as such, &#8220;fixed&#8221; once it&#8217;s published.</p>
<p>But given that I&#8217;m fortunate enough to have a fair number of comments, I also treat this blog as semi-fixed. Which is to say, it wouldn&#8217;t occur to me to delete old entries, and when I make changes, they&#8217;re <strike>almost alwaysÂ  </strike>usually clearly marked as changes&#8211;with the stupid old text crossed out (but still visible), or with a new section introduced with an <strong>Update:</strong> flag.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s me. I don&#8217;t at all suggest that it&#8217;s what anyone else should do. I&#8217;m not even convinced I&#8217;m &#8220;right.&#8221; So far, it&#8217;s what I&#8217;m most comfortable with.</p>
<p><b>Almost immediate update:</b> For simple typos, I&#8217;m likely just to fix them here. And, in this case, I did the same at C&#038;I. I might do that more often in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Miedema</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/03/oops-loosening-a-personal-stricture/comment-page-1/#comment-32345</link>
		<dc:creator>John Miedema</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=745#comment-32345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having noticed this post, and your later one, &quot;Too Random ...&quot;, I found myself wondering somewhat about people&#039;s blog policies on updates and deletions. Personally, I regard my blog as a wiki, meant to be updated. I always correct typos to give the post a more professional polish. On rare occasions, I delete posts that I put up too quickly, and that I think are snarky or otherwise inconsistent with my blog purpose. Every so many months, I delete the stuff I feel has no lasting value (or that has begun to irritate even me). I see it as a weeding or distillation process leading to quality. To me, it is a strength of the web that things can change easily, and I want to take advantage of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having noticed this post, and your later one, &#8220;Too Random &#8230;&#8221;, I found myself wondering somewhat about people&#8217;s blog policies on updates and deletions. Personally, I regard my blog as a wiki, meant to be updated. I always correct typos to give the post a more professional polish. On rare occasions, I delete posts that I put up too quickly, and that I think are snarky or otherwise inconsistent with my blog purpose. Every so many months, I delete the stuff I feel has no lasting value (or that has begun to irritate even me). I see it as a weeding or distillation process leading to quality. To me, it is a strength of the web that things can change easily, and I want to take advantage of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
