<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cites &amp; Insights 8:3 available &#8211; the centenary issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2008/02/cites-insights-83-available-the-centenary-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/02/cites-insights-83-available-the-centenary-issue/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 07:01:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/02/cites-insights-83-available-the-centenary-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-31967</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=707#comment-31967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John,

Well, yes, it would be nice to see you before 2017, but we can&#039;t check up on your projections until then. (I seem to be doing one speech a year these days, which means one conference a year other than ALA &amp; Midwinter. That could always change...)

Privacy continues to be an issue. I still believe that librarians have a duty to make it clear just what the dangers are of giving up privacy--and, frankly, that clever engineering could provide most of the increases in services (are patrons clamoring for these services) with little loss of privacy. But what do I know?

I dunno whether I&#039;m hoping that C&amp;I will last another 10 years from now. It seems like a long time...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Well, yes, it would be nice to see you before 2017, but we can&#8217;t check up on your projections until then. (I seem to be doing one speech a year these days, which means one conference a year other than ALA &#038; Midwinter. That could always change&#8230;)</p>
<p>Privacy continues to be an issue. I still believe that librarians have a duty to make it clear just what the dangers are of giving up privacy&#8211;and, frankly, that clever engineering could provide most of the increases in services (are patrons clamoring for these services) with little loss of privacy. But what do I know?</p>
<p>I dunno whether I&#8217;m hoping that C&#038;I will last another 10 years from now. It seems like a long time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dupuis</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2008/02/cites-insights-83-available-the-centenary-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-31966</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=707#comment-31966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Walt,

Congrats on reaching issue 100.  I for one look forward to seeing that issue 425.

Thanks for mentioning the My Job series.  It&#039;s a strange experience re-reading the essay after all these months.  There&#039;s hardly anything I&#039;d put the same way today.  For example, on privacy, I&#039;d be much more nuanced.  Perhaps from reading the OCLC Sharing, Privacy and Trust report I&#039;m thinking now that we have to look at privacy from a point of view of having a kind of baseline level of privacy then a bunch of user-configurable options where some decrease privacy can be exchanged for some kind of increase in service.  Essay-writers remorse, I guess.

And I hope we don&#039;t have to wait until 2017 until we run into each other at a conference!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Walt,</p>
<p>Congrats on reaching issue 100.  I for one look forward to seeing that issue 425.</p>
<p>Thanks for mentioning the My Job series.  It&#8217;s a strange experience re-reading the essay after all these months.  There&#8217;s hardly anything I&#8217;d put the same way today.  For example, on privacy, I&#8217;d be much more nuanced.  Perhaps from reading the OCLC Sharing, Privacy and Trust report I&#8217;m thinking now that we have to look at privacy from a point of view of having a kind of baseline level of privacy then a bunch of user-configurable options where some decrease privacy can be exchanged for some kind of increase in service.  Essay-writers remorse, I guess.</p>
<p>And I hope we don&#8217;t have to wait until 2017 until we run into each other at a conference!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
