<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next-Generation Library Catalogs (LTR): Mini-review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2007/10/next-generation-library-catalogs-ltr-mini-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/10/next-generation-library-catalogs-ltr-mini-review/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Talking Books Librarian</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/10/next-generation-library-catalogs-ltr-mini-review/#comment-29752</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking Books Librarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 20:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=647#comment-29752</guid>
		<description>As far as online library catalogs go, there are times that library staff use sites like Google or Amazon when seeking information about a particular book, or trying to find other similar books to recommend, rather than using the library OPAC... I think this shows how current OPAC's are lacking in user-friendliness and are not always very helpful.  Hopefully the new generation of OPAC's will be better....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as online library catalogs go, there are times that library staff use sites like Google or Amazon when seeking information about a particular book, or trying to find other similar books to recommend, rather than using the library OPAC&#8230; I think this shows how current OPAC&#8217;s are lacking in user-friendliness and are not always very helpful.  Hopefully the new generation of OPAC&#8217;s will be better&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
