<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s wrong with this picture?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.G. Schneider</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-29543</link>
		<dc:creator>K.G. Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 21:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=620#comment-29543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re &quot;This particular blog only accepts comments from some in crowd,&quot; don&#039;t discount that the comment and even the email are going straight to some spam bucket, especially if you&#039;re linking to any other sites.  My blog gets so much spam I have to trust my spam-catcher, and sometimes it&#039;s wrong.  I assume if Askimet makes errors on my blog, it makes errors on most WordPress blogs that are using it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re &#8220;This particular blog only accepts comments from some in crowd,&#8221; don&#8217;t discount that the comment and even the email are going straight to some spam bucket, especially if you&#8217;re linking to any other sites.  My blog gets so much spam I have to trust my spam-catcher, and sometimes it&#8217;s wrong.  I assume if Askimet makes errors on my blog, it makes errors on most WordPress blogs that are using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-29435</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=620#comment-29435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Barbara,

I picked up your quote--or at least I picked up those Gallup figures, and I think it was from you--as part of the 2,000-word piece I wrote about reporting on the AP/Ipsos poll...and recounting my comments when NEA was doing its ashes-and-sackcloth number over the 2002 report. 

As for numeracy...don&#039;t get me started. 

Thanks for the comment!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barbara,</p>
<p>I picked up your quote&#8211;or at least I picked up those Gallup figures, and I think it was from you&#8211;as part of the 2,000-word piece I wrote about reporting on the AP/Ipsos poll&#8230;and recounting my comments when NEA was doing its ashes-and-sackcloth number over the 2002 report. </p>
<p>As for numeracy&#8230;don&#8217;t get me started. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbara Fister</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/whats-wrong-with-this-picture/comment-page-1/#comment-29434</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbara Fister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=620#comment-29434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was mulling over the same thing. There was a figure in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/goodbye_to_all_that_1.php?page=all&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a recent threnody about the persistence of the decline of book reviewing&lt;/a&gt; by Steve Wasserman: â€œIn 1937, Gallup found that only 29 percent of all adults read books; in 1955, the percentage had sunk to 17 percent. Fifteen years later, in 1970, the club evidently no longer could bear to know, and Gallup stopped asking.â€ 

Oddly enough, though, people keep asking and the answer is always bad news, no matter how good it is. 

I&#039;m beginning to think the real problem is not literacy but numeracy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was mulling over the same thing. There was a figure in <a href="http://www.cjr.org/cover_story/goodbye_to_all_that_1.php?page=all" rel="nofollow">a recent threnody about the persistence of the decline of book reviewing</a> by Steve Wasserman: â€œIn 1937, Gallup found that only 29 percent of all adults read books; in 1955, the percentage had sunk to 17 percent. Fifteen years later, in 1970, the club evidently no longer could bear to know, and Gallup stopped asking.â€ </p>
<p>Oddly enough, though, people keep asking and the answer is always bad news, no matter how good it is. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think the real problem is not literacy but numeracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
