<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future of C&amp;I (&amp; this blog): blue skies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:18:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29574</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks, and I&#039;d say (probably) is essentially certain, just not fully public yet. Andy: I wasn&#039;t aware of that one; I was aware that right-click functions and other choices are far more clearly stated. Sounds like Word&#039;s doing a &quot;presumptive right click&quot; based on hovering; as long as you can turn it off (if your machine&#039;s marginal), that seems like an excellent idea. 

It looks as though I may wait a while after all, since I&#039;ve now figured out what the problem with my old PC is, but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, and I&#8217;d say (probably) is essentially certain, just not fully public yet. Andy: I wasn&#8217;t aware of that one; I was aware that right-click functions and other choices are far more clearly stated. Sounds like Word&#8217;s doing a &#8220;presumptive right click&#8221; based on hovering; as long as you can turn it off (if your machine&#8217;s marginal), that seems like an excellent idea. </p>
<p>It looks as though I may wait a while after all, since I&#8217;ve now figured out what the problem with my old PC is, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to hear things are (probably) working out, Walt!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear things are (probably) working out, Walt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Havens</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29566</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Havens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt -- good to hear the good almost news. Looking forward to details.

Also... the singe function about Word 2007 that I love to death is that if you select some text and let your cursor hover over it... a magic tool box appears that lets you alter the most common characteristics; font size, color, bold, italics, etc. No clicking (beyond selecting the text)... it just knows, &quot;Hey... if you&#039;re thinking about that text, you probably want to do something to it. Like... this.&quot; Love it. Took awhile to get used to, but so slick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt &#8212; good to hear the good almost news. Looking forward to details.</p>
<p>Also&#8230; the singe function about Word 2007 that I love to death is that if you select some text and let your cursor hover over it&#8230; a magic tool box appears that lets you alter the most common characteristics; font size, color, bold, italics, etc. No clicking (beyond selecting the text)&#8230; it just knows, &#8220;Hey&#8230; if you&#8217;re thinking about that text, you probably want to do something to it. Like&#8230; this.&#8221; Love it. Took awhile to get used to, but so slick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29563</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, and Peter: I&#039;ll post about the core situation as soon as possible, but that will require coordination with the people I&#039;ll be working for. Soon...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Peter: I&#8217;ll post about the core situation as soon as possible, but that will require coordination with the people I&#8217;ll be working for. Soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29562</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John, this is a classic YMMV situation...and since I have a full copy of Office 2003 sitting in a box, I&#039;m certainly not obligated to move to 2007 when I move to Vista...but my wife&#039;s been using Word 2007 and Excel 2007 for a few weeks, and finds them much preferable to Word 2000/2003--for reasons that make sense to me. There&#039;s definitely a learning curve; it&#039;s easier for her because she didn&#039;t like the old Word (and its over-helpfulness), and she sees the logic in the new function groupings. Just looking over her shoulder, so do I--but there&#039;s no question that it involves unlearning/relearning.

Tried OpenOffice. Not for me. And Google&#039;s a little too involved in my life already...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, this is a classic YMMV situation&#8230;and since I have a full copy of Office 2003 sitting in a box, I&#8217;m certainly not obligated to move to 2007 when I move to Vista&#8230;but my wife&#8217;s been using Word 2007 and Excel 2007 for a few weeks, and finds them much preferable to Word 2000/2003&#8211;for reasons that make sense to me. There&#8217;s definitely a learning curve; it&#8217;s easier for her because she didn&#8217;t like the old Word (and its over-helpfulness), and she sees the logic in the new function groupings. Just looking over her shoulder, so do I&#8211;but there&#8217;s no question that it involves unlearning/relearning.</p>
<p>Tried OpenOffice. Not for me. And Google&#8217;s a little too involved in my life already&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Murray</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29561</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;As of right now, Iâ€™m about 99% certain that C&amp;I will continueâ€“not because of direct sponsorship (still up in the air), but because of a satisfactory â€œcore situation.â€&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hear, hear, Walt!  Not only for the welcome continuation of C&amp;I, but more importantly for the &#039;satisfatory &quot;core situation.&quot;&#039;!  I can&#039;t wait to hear more about it.  Actually, I can -- there is no sense in jinxing it...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>As of right now, Iâ€™m about 99% certain that C&amp;I will continueâ€“not because of direct sponsorship (still up in the air), but because of a satisfactory â€œcore situation.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>Hear, hear, Walt!  Not only for the welcome continuation of C&amp;I, but more importantly for the &#8216;satisfatory &#8220;core situation.&#8221;&#8216;!  I can&#8217;t wait to hear more about it.  Actually, I can &#8212; there is no sense in jinxing it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dupuis</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29560</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a word of warning: my wife hates Office 2007.  We upgraded from a fairly old version when we bought our new computer and she&#039;s really having a hard time getting used to the new interface.  The kids and I use Open Office at home and are really happy with it, but it may not be powerful enough for serious document preparation.  Google Docs is also a really interesting option for a lot of the really simple stuff that I do, at least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a word of warning: my wife hates Office 2007.  We upgraded from a fairly old version when we bought our new computer and she&#8217;s really having a hard time getting used to the new interface.  The kids and I use Open Office at home and are really happy with it, but it may not be powerful enough for serious document preparation.  Google Docs is also a really interesting option for a lot of the really simple stuff that I do, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29559</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. I&#039;m hoping that things will work out so that I can also do Making it Work (maybe with a different name) as a separate--I think that will particularly work well as a synthesis and commentary on what&#039;s being said, and one of several related efforts to move libraries forward.

Yesterday was a strange day--I got the good news, but then went home and found my PC malfunctioning (in pretty much the same manner that my wife&#039;s now-replaced notebook started malfunctioning a few weeks ago...). I may be migrating to Vista and Office 2007 a little sooner than I&#039;d intended! (And if waltcrawford.name doesn&#039;t show evidence of the new position for a while, that may be the reason: I could be entirely off the air for a few days.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. I&#8217;m hoping that things will work out so that I can also do Making it Work (maybe with a different name) as a separate&#8211;I think that will particularly work well as a synthesis and commentary on what&#8217;s being said, and one of several related efforts to move libraries forward.</p>
<p>Yesterday was a strange day&#8211;I got the good news, but then went home and found my PC malfunctioning (in pretty much the same manner that my wife&#8217;s now-replaced notebook started malfunctioning a few weeks ago&#8230;). I may be migrating to Vista and Office 2007 a little sooner than I&#8217;d intended! (And if waltcrawford.name doesn&#8217;t show evidence of the new position for a while, that may be the reason: I could be entirely off the air for a few days.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dupuis</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29558</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dupuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news, Walt.  Good luck dotting the i&#039;s and crossing the t&#039;s.  It must feel great to have the situation settled without having to go through a period of even more uncertainty post-Sept 30.

I, for one, would have sorely missed C&amp;I; I find it far more useful and entertaining than a bunch of disconnected blog posts for surveying the library world and helping me advance my own understanding of the challenges we face.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news, Walt.  Good luck dotting the i&#8217;s and crossing the t&#8217;s.  It must feel great to have the situation settled without having to go through a period of even more uncertainty post-Sept 30.</p>
<p>I, for one, would have sorely missed C&#038;I; I find it far more useful and entertaining than a bunch of disconnected blog posts for surveying the library world and helping me advance my own understanding of the challenges we face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothea Salo</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/09/future-of-ci-this-blog-blue-skies/comment-page-1/#comment-29557</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothea Salo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=630#comment-29557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great to hear, Walt!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to hear, Walt!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
