<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cites &amp; Insights 7:4 available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2007/03/cites-insights-74-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/03/cites-insights-74-available/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:18:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/03/cites-insights-74-available/comment-page-1/#comment-26727</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 14:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=505#comment-26727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#039;ll see. The problem with self-publishing, particularly if you go naked (without ISBN/Ingram distribution), is that you&#039;re dependent on your own promotion and name for all sales. While I don&#039;t plan to reveal actual sales, I do plan to offer general comments on how it is or isn&#039;t going. But my case may not be generally applicable: For better or worse, I have a fairly well-established name and reasonably broad publicity mechanisms. (So do you, but that&#039;s not always the case.)

I would never go the Lulu route for a first or second or third book in the library field if a traditional publisher was available, unless timing or other circumstances made it an obvious winner. 

On the other hand, the Lulu approach is a whole lot better than using a vanity press if what you plan is just a few copies of your work for a small audience--per-book costs may be higher but the overall outlay is likely to be lower.

Anyway, we shall see. It&#039;s hard to type with crossed fingers, but...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see. The problem with self-publishing, particularly if you go naked (without ISBN/Ingram distribution), is that you&#8217;re dependent on your own promotion and name for all sales. While I don&#8217;t plan to reveal actual sales, I do plan to offer general comments on how it is or isn&#8217;t going. But my case may not be generally applicable: For better or worse, I have a fairly well-established name and reasonably broad publicity mechanisms. (So do you, but that&#8217;s not always the case.)</p>
<p>I would never go the Lulu route for a first or second or third book in the library field if a traditional publisher was available, unless timing or other circumstances made it an obvious winner. </p>
<p>On the other hand, the Lulu approach is a whole lot better than using a vanity press if what you plan is just a few copies of your work for a small audience&#8211;per-book costs may be higher but the overall outlay is likely to be lower.</p>
<p>Anyway, we shall see. It&#8217;s hard to type with crossed fingers, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven bell</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/03/cites-insights-74-available/comment-page-1/#comment-26724</link>
		<dc:creator>steven bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 12:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=505#comment-26724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congratulations on the publication of your book. I plan to get a copy and look forward to reading it.

You&#039;ve been talking about doing this for a while - and now you did it. I think it provides a good model for others who may want to self-publish their writings.

StevenB]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on the publication of your book. I plan to get a copy and look forward to reading it.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve been talking about doing this for a while &#8211; and now you did it. I think it provides a good model for others who may want to self-publish their writings.</p>
<p>StevenB</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
