<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Late Bloglines notifications: You&#8217;re not alone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24820</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, no apology required. The post itself was sloppily written early in the morning -- well, not THAT early, but -- and easy enough to misinterpret.

Another datum: The revised post showed up in Bloglines within an hour after posting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, no apology required. The post itself was sloppily written early in the morning &#8212; well, not THAT early, but &#8212; and easy enough to misinterpret.</p>
<p>Another datum: The revised post showed up in Bloglines within an hour after posting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24814</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry about the misinterpretation, Walt.  That&#039;s what happens when I&#039;m up at 3:30, I guess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the misinterpretation, Walt.  That&#8217;s what happens when I&#8217;m up at 3:30, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24809</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems indeed you are not the only one.  I have noticed it as well, not to mention the fact that once in a while I get some blog suddenly showing with 20 or more posts in a shot, only to see they are all old posts I saw already. So it either fails to update, or it repeats old stuff. I like Bloglines features, and I have a lot of stuff saved in clippings, but I am seriously considering a switch if I find something good. It may be free, but it does not mean the annoyance factor is worth it, and I am starting to get annoyed. Best, and keep on blogging.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems indeed you are not the only one.  I have noticed it as well, not to mention the fact that once in a while I get some blog suddenly showing with 20 or more posts in a shot, only to see they are all old posts I saw already. So it either fails to update, or it repeats old stuff. I like Bloglines features, and I have a lot of stuff saved in clippings, but I am seriously considering a switch if I find something good. It may be free, but it does not mean the annoyance factor is worth it, and I am starting to get annoyed. Best, and keep on blogging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24802</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark, Actually, I thought I was saying that the # of subscribers *seemed* like a good theory, but couldn&#039;t be right, for exactly the reasons you cite: I have enough subscribers that I should be getting reasonably rapid polling. 

Oddly enough, I got the post above at 5:50 a.m. this morning, according to Bloglines&#039; time stamp--roughly an hour after you did, and two days after the post. That&#039;s better than 4 or 6 days.

I just checked Urchin [statistics] for the past week. Of the four feeds (at least one of which is just comments), the number of subscribers and number of Bloglines hits over the week was:

1. 192 subscribers, 15 hits. [Seems like a low frequency.]
2. 191 subscribers, 41 hits. [Six a day: That sounds plausible.]
3. 4 subscribers, 42 hits [Probably the comments feed]
4. 33 subscribers, 76 hits [11/day, way more than enough]

&quot;Feedfetcher-Google&quot; had 433 hits for the week. Feedster had 54 (I don&#039;t have a Feedster account setup). One bot was in the low thousands... (Oh, and sessions, which presumably doesn&#039;t include bots, averaged about 1350/day for the week.)

I don&#039;t know what to make of all this. I added a note on the Bloglines feedback forum, but I don&#039;t have any sense that anyone from Bloglines is monitoring or responding to those &quot;feedback&quot; forums--so far, it looks like a place for disgruntled users to vent to one another.

I know, I know: The price is right. And I could always switch (I keep KeepNews down to a dozen or fewer, because I keep stuff I want to use later in paper form...I know, that&#039;s terribly luddite, but...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, Actually, I thought I was saying that the # of subscribers *seemed* like a good theory, but couldn&#8217;t be right, for exactly the reasons you cite: I have enough subscribers that I should be getting reasonably rapid polling. </p>
<p>Oddly enough, I got the post above at 5:50 a.m. this morning, according to Bloglines&#8217; time stamp&#8211;roughly an hour after you did, and two days after the post. That&#8217;s better than 4 or 6 days.</p>
<p>I just checked Urchin [statistics] for the past week. Of the four feeds (at least one of which is just comments), the number of subscribers and number of Bloglines hits over the week was:</p>
<p>1. 192 subscribers, 15 hits. [Seems like a low frequency.]<br />
2. 191 subscribers, 41 hits. [Six a day: That sounds plausible.]<br />
3. 4 subscribers, 42 hits [Probably the comments feed]<br />
4. 33 subscribers, 76 hits [11/day, way more than enough]</p>
<p>&#8220;Feedfetcher-Google&#8221; had 433 hits for the week. Feedster had 54 (I don&#8217;t have a Feedster account setup). One bot was in the low thousands&#8230; (Oh, and sessions, which presumably doesn&#8217;t include bots, averaged about 1350/day for the week.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to make of all this. I added a note on the Bloglines feedback forum, but I don&#8217;t have any sense that anyone from Bloglines is monitoring or responding to those &#8220;feedback&#8221; forums&#8211;so far, it looks like a place for disgruntled users to vent to one another.</p>
<p>I know, I know: The price is right. And I could always switch (I keep KeepNews down to a dozen or fewer, because I keep stuff I want to use later in paper form&#8230;I know, that&#8217;s terribly luddite, but&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24800</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was me, or me and....  This one just showed up on Monday at 6 AM-ish Central.  I say that confidently because I was up at 3:30 unfortunately.

Jennifer, it has been on and off for a couple months now.  And it was worse--or so it seemed--a couple months back.  And I can generally live with it for most feeds, but I consider this one of the most valuable feeds I subscribe to.

Walt, I think your theory about # of subscribers is flawed.  I often get my posts in Bloglines before I can even get from posting to logging into Bloglines.  Or at most, usually within about 5 minutes, and you have far more subs in Bloglines than I do (407 vs 59 if my math is right).

I find it sort of ironic to see this now, as I was just heading off to write a post and ask for suggestions for another web-based aggregator.  I doubt I&#039;ll switch either, though, as I have over 4700 items marked Keep New and I don&#039;t think it is possible to stop a feed AND keep the things already marked in Bloglines.  That would&#039;ve been the 2nd part of my question.

And, yes, I know I need to weed that stuff out.  I have been trying, but it takes time.  Not something I have a lot of.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was me, or me and&#8230;.  This one just showed up on Monday at 6 AM-ish Central.  I say that confidently because I was up at 3:30 unfortunately.</p>
<p>Jennifer, it has been on and off for a couple months now.  And it was worse&#8211;or so it seemed&#8211;a couple months back.  And I can generally live with it for most feeds, but I consider this one of the most valuable feeds I subscribe to.</p>
<p>Walt, I think your theory about # of subscribers is flawed.  I often get my posts in Bloglines before I can even get from posting to logging into Bloglines.  Or at most, usually within about 5 minutes, and you have far more subs in Bloglines than I do (407 vs 59 if my math is right).</p>
<p>I find it sort of ironic to see this now, as I was just heading off to write a post and ask for suggestions for another web-based aggregator.  I doubt I&#8217;ll switch either, though, as I have over 4700 items marked Keep New and I don&#8217;t think it is possible to stop a feed AND keep the things already marked in Bloglines.  That would&#8217;ve been the 2nd part of my question.</p>
<p>And, yes, I know I need to weed that stuff out.  I have been trying, but it takes time.  Not something I have a lot of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24784</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to admit your post made me curious so I went through my bloglines account list and took a quick look at the &quot;updated&quot; information on several blogs.  Color me surprised to notice there were several who had posted over the weekend and the feed did not make it to my list. I like Bloglines and am hesitant to move away too quickly (though it wouldn&#039;t kill me to try another reader...).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit your post made me curious so I went through my bloglines account list and took a quick look at the &#8220;updated&#8221; information on several blogs.  Color me surprised to notice there were several who had posted over the weekend and the feed did not make it to my list. I like Bloglines and am hesitant to move away too quickly (though it wouldn&#8217;t kill me to try another reader&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2007/01/late-bloglines-notifications-youre-not-alone/comment-page-1/#comment-24757</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 02:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=471#comment-24757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walt, I first noticed this problem in Bloglines in October. I initially noticed that my new blog posts were not showing up in a timely manner. After a while, I started going through most blogs that I subscribed to manually. In all honesty, it seems to be completely random - and at this point, has happened to every blog to which I subscribe at some point in time regardless of popularity. Recently, it has been taking 3-5 days for your posts to show up. I have been using other aggregators of late (but I still keep checking in Bloglines too). I guess the reason that I find it so frustrating is that I can&#039;t figure out why it is happening or any pattern for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walt, I first noticed this problem in Bloglines in October. I initially noticed that my new blog posts were not showing up in a timely manner. After a while, I started going through most blogs that I subscribed to manually. In all honesty, it seems to be completely random &#8211; and at this point, has happened to every blog to which I subscribe at some point in time regardless of popularity. Recently, it has been taking 3-5 days for your posts to show up. I have been using other aggregators of late (but I still keep checking in Bloglines too). I guess the reason that I find it so frustrating is that I can&#8217;t figure out why it is happening or any pattern for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
