<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thanks yourself &#8211; and a web metrics question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 04:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/comment-page-1/#comment-23317</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=418#comment-23317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As noted in the update to the post, &quot;So the answer is 3552&quot; is wrong. &quot;The answer&quot; for direct readership is just over 5,000. No complaints here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As noted in the update to the post, &#8220;So the answer is 3552&#8243; is wrong. &#8220;The answer&#8221; for direct readership is just over 5,000. No complaints here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iris</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/comment-page-1/#comment-23256</link>
		<dc:creator>Iris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=418#comment-23256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was so interesting to read about your writing habits in this C&amp;I.  You&#039;re right, they wouldn&#039;t work for me, but it&#039;s the way I always think *should* work for me. :)  Me, I sit sideways on the couch with my laptop on my lap, my cat on my legs, and listening to music or watching TV.  It would drive you batty.  A good cup of tea in the evening or coffee in the morning never hurts, either.

But I think I need to get a little bit more deliberate about my &quot;other&quot; writing and research, and setting aside regular time will help with that.  I also find that I have to do that kind of writing sitting at the table (I don&#039;t have a study).  I don&#039;t find that writing fun, so any distraction (other than music) is too much.  What&#039;s more, because it isn&#039;t fun, if I don&#039;t plan time for it I always end up filling my time with activities that are more interesting.  I&#039;m just so tired of clicking through web sites, collecting their metadata, and entering that into my growing database.  And the analysis me and my co-author do isn&#039;t interesting enough to make two years of boring data collection seem worth it.  Ah well.  The sooner I get started the sooner I&#039;ll finish, and then I&#039;ll say &quot;no&quot; to any invitations to continue on with similar research.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was so interesting to read about your writing habits in this C&amp;I.  You&#8217;re right, they wouldn&#8217;t work for me, but it&#8217;s the way I always think *should* work for me. <img src='http://walt.lishost.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Me, I sit sideways on the couch with my laptop on my lap, my cat on my legs, and listening to music or watching TV.  It would drive you batty.  A good cup of tea in the evening or coffee in the morning never hurts, either.</p>
<p>But I think I need to get a little bit more deliberate about my &#8220;other&#8221; writing and research, and setting aside regular time will help with that.  I also find that I have to do that kind of writing sitting at the table (I don&#8217;t have a study).  I don&#8217;t find that writing fun, so any distraction (other than music) is too much.  What&#8217;s more, because it isn&#8217;t fun, if I don&#8217;t plan time for it I always end up filling my time with activities that are more interesting.  I&#8217;m just so tired of clicking through web sites, collecting their metadata, and entering that into my growing database.  And the analysis me and my co-author do isn&#8217;t interesting enough to make two years of boring data collection seem worth it.  Ah well.  The sooner I get started the sooner I&#8217;ll finish, and then I&#8217;ll say &#8220;no&#8221; to any invitations to continue on with similar research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/comment-page-1/#comment-23238</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=418#comment-23238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the answer is 3552, some portion of which involved page-by-page reading. Fascinating. Now I know!

(And, Blake, I do still check spam before it goes away...although I can&#039;t for the life of me imagine why this would be flagged as spam!)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the answer is 3552, some portion of which involved page-by-page reading. Fascinating. Now I know!</p>
<p>(And, Blake, I do still check spam before it goes away&#8230;although I can&#8217;t for the life of me imagine why this would be flagged as spam!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/11/thanks-yourself-and-a-web-metrics-question/comment-page-1/#comment-23237</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 19:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=418#comment-23237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/support/urchin45/bin/answer.py?answer=28750&amp;query=requested+page+&amp;topic=&amp;type=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Why are Page Views higher than Downloads for the same file?&lt;/a&gt;

 

It is common for your page views reports to include a higher number of hits than your downloads reports for the same file. For example, many customers report to us that specific PDF files display more hits under the Requested Pages report than they do in the Downloads report. 

Here&#039;s why: 

In the case of a PDF file, many browsers include a plug-in that displays PDF files one page at a time. The initial page request results in a 200 status code from the web server. All subsequent pages result in a 206 (partial download) status code since the browser plugin only downloads the page you are viewing and not the entire document. So, in the case where you view 5 PDF pages from the same document, the web server will record one hit with a 200 status code and 4 hits with a 206 status code, all logged as the same PDF document. 

Here&#039;s how Urchin Reports interpret and display this information: 

Downloads: A download hit requires a status code of 200, 302 or 304, so the report will show only one download for this PDF file - e.g. the single hit with the 200 status code. 

Requested Pages: The report will show all successful file requests where the status code is 2XX, 302 or 304 and where the file is matches the proper MIME type to be considered a page view. By default, Urchin 5 treats all MIME types as page views except for files with these suffixes: gif,jpg,jpeg,png,js,css,cur,ico,ida. 

So, the 5 PDF requests in the example above would all be counted as hits to this document in the Requested Pages report page views, since each hit contained either a 200 or 206 status code. 

The choice was made to count each partial download hit (206 status) as a discrete page view in the Requested Pages report since each hit more or less corresponds to a single page within a multi-page PDF document. This is consistent with the philosophy of the Requested Pages report representing actual page impressions seen by a visitor.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.google.com/support/urchin45/bin/answer.py?answer=28750&amp;query=requested+page+&amp;topic=&amp;type=" rel="nofollow">Why are Page Views higher than Downloads for the same file?</a></p>
<p>It is common for your page views reports to include a higher number of hits than your downloads reports for the same file. For example, many customers report to us that specific PDF files display more hits under the Requested Pages report than they do in the Downloads report. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why: </p>
<p>In the case of a PDF file, many browsers include a plug-in that displays PDF files one page at a time. The initial page request results in a 200 status code from the web server. All subsequent pages result in a 206 (partial download) status code since the browser plugin only downloads the page you are viewing and not the entire document. So, in the case where you view 5 PDF pages from the same document, the web server will record one hit with a 200 status code and 4 hits with a 206 status code, all logged as the same PDF document. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how Urchin Reports interpret and display this information: </p>
<p>Downloads: A download hit requires a status code of 200, 302 or 304, so the report will show only one download for this PDF file &#8211; e.g. the single hit with the 200 status code. </p>
<p>Requested Pages: The report will show all successful file requests where the status code is 2XX, 302 or 304 and where the file is matches the proper MIME type to be considered a page view. By default, Urchin 5 treats all MIME types as page views except for files with these suffixes: gif,jpg,jpeg,png,js,css,cur,ico,ida. </p>
<p>So, the 5 PDF requests in the example above would all be counted as hits to this document in the Requested Pages report page views, since each hit contained either a 200 or 206 status code. </p>
<p>The choice was made to count each partial download hit (206 status) as a discrete page view in the Requested Pages report since each hit more or less corresponds to a single page within a multi-page PDF document. This is consistent with the philosophy of the Requested Pages report representing actual page impressions seen by a visitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
