<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Firefox that didn&#8217;t bite</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2006/10/the-firefox-that-didnt-bite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/10/the-firefox-that-didnt-bite/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Christina Pikas</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/10/the-firefox-that-didnt-bite/#comment-22073</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Pikas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=398#comment-22073</guid>
		<description>Thanks for testing it first :) I'm ready to upgrade now.  I'm sort of glad they didn't do it as an automatic update -- going to 1.5 broke everything and was a real hassle so I lost a bit of trust.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for testing it first <img src='http://walt.lishost.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I&#8217;m ready to upgrade now.  I&#8217;m sort of glad they didn&#8217;t do it as an automatic update &#8212; going to 1.5 broke everything and was a real hassle so I lost a bit of trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Cornwall</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/10/the-firefox-that-didnt-bite/#comment-22071</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Cornwall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=398#comment-22071</guid>
		<description>So far so good. When 2.0 installed, it announced it didn't like my del.icio.us extension, but promptly offered to install the newest version.

I was looking forward to Firefox 2.0 so that could try the new &lt;a href="http://www.zotero.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;Zotero&lt;/a&gt; tool. I've played around with it a little bit. Nothing exciting to report yet other than it is easy to add things to Zotero. I've got a few ideas for bibliography and I'll try to post how those things go.

Try being the operative word.  I seem to have too many interests and too little time these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far so good. When 2.0 installed, it announced it didn&#8217;t like my del.icio.us extension, but promptly offered to install the newest version.</p>
<p>I was looking forward to Firefox 2.0 so that could try the new <a href="http://www.zotero.org" rel="nofollow">Zotero</a> tool. I&#8217;ve played around with it a little bit. Nothing exciting to report yet other than it is easy to add things to Zotero. I&#8217;ve got a few ideas for bibliography and I&#8217;ll try to post how those things go.</p>
<p>Try being the operative word.  I seem to have too many interests and too little time these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/10/the-firefox-that-didnt-bite/#comment-22052</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=398#comment-22052</guid>
		<description>Yep, I'm pretty happy with FF2.0, too. Just waiting for Snappr (extension that lets you do screenshots) to be upgraded for 2.0... most other things seem to be working fine, and so far I've not been tempted to look at IE7. I'll probably stop resisting and look at it soon, for work purposes, but for non-work purposes I'll stick with FF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I&#8217;m pretty happy with FF2.0, too. Just waiting for Snappr (extension that lets you do screenshots) to be upgraded for 2.0&#8230; most other things seem to be working fine, and so far I&#8217;ve not been tempted to look at IE7. I&#8217;ll probably stop resisting and look at it soon, for work purposes, but for non-work purposes I&#8217;ll stick with FF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
