<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assistant librarian?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/comment-page-1/#comment-3371</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=224#comment-3371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my grad school professors told us that if you have to guess a year that something important happened in librarianship, always guess 1876.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my grad school professors told us that if you have to guess a year that something important happened in librarianship, always guess 1876.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruth Ellen</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/comment-page-1/#comment-3338</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruth Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=224#comment-3338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[85%. But I KNOW that I got at least all but one right. (One I wasn&#039;t sure of.) So I&#039;m not convinced of the accuracy of the test, especially since it doesn&#039;t give the answers that the test-makers believe are correct.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>85%. But I KNOW that I got at least all but one right. (One I wasn&#8217;t sure of.) So I&#8217;m not convinced of the accuracy of the test, especially since it doesn&#8217;t give the answers that the test-makers believe are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=224#comment-3337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also got 75%, which I decided, based on no evidence, must be a reflection of the 75% of library school I have completed.  I, too, was irritated that I couldn&#039;t figure out which ones I&#039;d missed--but not so irritated that I am going to devote time to tracking down all the answers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also got 75%, which I decided, based on no evidence, must be a reflection of the 75% of library school I have completed.  I, too, was irritated that I couldn&#8217;t figure out which ones I&#8217;d missed&#8211;but not so irritated that I am going to devote time to tracking down all the answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/comment-page-1/#comment-3336</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=224#comment-3336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of the questions speak fairly directly to my experience and sheer longevity in the field (my ALA 100th Anniversary mug from 1976, having dealt with MARC for 30++ years, and a few others). It wouldn&#039;t be hard to formulate an equally or more relevant test where you&#039;d score twice as high as I would.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of the questions speak fairly directly to my experience and sheer longevity in the field (my ALA 100th Anniversary mug from 1976, having dealt with MARC for 30++ years, and a few others). It wouldn&#8217;t be hard to formulate an equally or more relevant test where you&#8217;d score twice as high as I would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tangognat</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2006/01/assistant-librarian/comment-page-1/#comment-3334</link>
		<dc:creator>tangognat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=224#comment-3334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I scored much worse, around 60%. So much for library school! I don&#039;t think there was a way of displaying the answers you missed, I didn&#039;t see it at least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I scored much worse, around 60%. So much for library school! I don&#8217;t think there was a way of displaying the answers you missed, I didn&#8217;t see it at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
