<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dropping the dial-up and one cheer for MSN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2005/09/dropping-the-dial-up-and-one-cheer-for-msn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/09/dropping-the-dial-up-and-one-cheer-for-msn/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/09/dropping-the-dial-up-and-one-cheer-for-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-462</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=138#comment-462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not sure how the comment relates to the post, but chose to approve it anyway. Recording line-in is still recording the audio stream (as opposed to ripping from CD to MP3, entirely in the digital domain, on a PC). Theoretically, there should be some loss in the process. Realistically, for a portable player, it may not make much difference (if you&#039;re recording at 128K, the losses from MP3 probably exceed any losses from the digital:analog:digital roundtrip). Purely an opinion; I haven&#039;t used the device in question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the comment relates to the post, but chose to approve it anyway. Recording line-in is still recording the audio stream (as opposed to ripping from CD to MP3, entirely in the digital domain, on a PC). Theoretically, there should be some loss in the process. Realistically, for a portable player, it may not make much difference (if you&#8217;re recording at 128K, the losses from MP3 probably exceed any losses from the digital:analog:digital roundtrip). Purely an opinion; I haven&#8217;t used the device in question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james gadberry</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/09/dropping-the-dial-up-and-one-cheer-for-msn/comment-page-1/#comment-461</link>
		<dc:creator>james gadberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=138#comment-461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello.
A question for you concerning a MP3 player with direct line-in for recording from CD. Is there any difference in quality with this type of input? I bought a I-River portable device with line in, and it was a little more expensive than without line in. Sound quality seem good to me. I left the Mini-Disc player to go to a smaller, easier to carry device for convenience and the MP3 stores more songs than the MD.
Thanks for your opinion,
James]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello.<br />
A question for you concerning a MP3 player with direct line-in for recording from CD. Is there any difference in quality with this type of input? I bought a I-River portable device with line in, and it was a little more expensive than without line in. Sound quality seem good to me. I left the Mini-Disc player to go to a smaller, easier to carry device for convenience and the MP3 stores more songs than the MD.<br />
Thanks for your opinion,<br />
James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
