<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sort of a book review.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/</link>
	<description>The library voice of the radical middle.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 04:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tangognat</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>tangognat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=96#comment-283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, I did what any librarian should have done in the first place, I looked it up, and it seems like they published an essay on the topic in the New Yorker around 1998.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I did what any librarian should have done in the first place, I looked it up, and it seems like they published an essay on the topic in the New Yorker around 1998.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: walt</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>walt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=96#comment-277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone else may know; I don&#039;t read the &lt;i&gt;New Yorker&lt;/i&gt;, and the book&#039;s back on the Crystal Harmony, so I can&#039;t check the credits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone else may know; I don&#8217;t read the <i>New Yorker</i>, and the book&#8217;s back on the Crystal Harmony, so I can&#8217;t check the credits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tangognat</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator>tangognat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=96#comment-276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was part of this published in the New Yorker? The story sounds really familiar to me, but I haven&#039;t read the book.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was part of this published in the New Yorker? The story sounds really familiar to me, but I haven&#8217;t read the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessamyn</title>
		<link>http://walt.lishost.org/2005/07/sort-of-a-book-review/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>jessamyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://walt.lishost.org/?p=96#comment-275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found the weirder part of this book to be how they discussed the windfall of money they had gotten through their parents&#039; death fueled them being crazy with it, and how their mourning for their brother [easily the more talented, definitely the most revered of the Barthelme brothers] sort of sent them over the edge. I found that they did a good job at explaining the craziness of gambling addiction but, like you, I found a lot of their justifications and complaints to be largely dismissable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the weirder part of this book to be how they discussed the windfall of money they had gotten through their parents&#8217; death fueled them being crazy with it, and how their mourning for their brother [easily the more talented, definitely the most revered of the Barthelme brothers] sort of sent them over the edge. I found that they did a good job at explaining the craziness of gambling addiction but, like you, I found a lot of their justifications and complaints to be largely dismissable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
