Having now done both–written an ACRL session report for Cites & Insights and written blog posts for ALA sessions, I’m decidedly ambivalent. The blog posts were easier, but not as carefully written or as detailed as what I wrote for C&I. I got more links and mentions on the web from the C&I article. Some of that was the relative popularity of the topic (nothing I wrote about from ALA had the word “Google” in the title). But some of it was the higher profile of C&I than my little blog, even when the posts are linked from the wonderful conference wiki.