Comments on: Gorman, Cohen, Bell, and Berman collaboration?

By: walt

walt — Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:58:05 +0000

Dorothea–as it was intended to. It’s not April 1, and I didn’t expect anyone to fall for that. On the other hand, I wonder if I couldn’t get that paper accepted in certain IS conferences?

By: Dorothea Salo

Dorothea Salo — Sat, 16 Apr 2005 23:32:11 +0000

I’m afraid you’ll have to work a little harder if you really want my leg to come off when you pull it. That list of authors tripped my BS sensor right away.

By: Greg

Greg — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:52:30 +0000

Gosh, you had to get MY last name right, didn’t you? Having already been taken to task today for being foolish/naive/oblivious enough to have publicly expressed an opinion, you just had to go and stick your finger in the wound, didn’t you? Didn’t you!?!?! I’m gonna go crawl back in my hole now, like a good public librarian.

By: walt

walt — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:58:24 +0000

King, Weed, Bell, Cohen: Do last names really matter? Particularly on bogus scholarly papers? (What? You don’t know David Weed’s insightful library weblog? Maybe there isn’t one?)

By: Steven M. Cohen

Steven M. Cohen — Fri, 15 Apr 2005 19:53:27 +0000

I think you mean David King, not David Weed.

And I’m a blogger, remember? What’s a scholarly paper?